USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Igneous Systems, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Igneous ranks #19,888 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 6 technology areas.

#19,888
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (33.0/100)
26.2
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19888 · US Corporation #19,888 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,888/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ikena Oncology
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.0/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 26.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ikena Oncology, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Igneous’s 33.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Igneous

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Igneous's Innovation Score is 33.0/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Igneous?

Each dot is one of Igneous’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Igneous’s own 26.2 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Igneous vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 051015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Itire, LLC - 14, 16.5ItireITN Energy Systems, Inc. - 14, 14.43ITN Energy SystemsIxcela, Inc. - 14, 10IxcelaIzumi Products Company - 14, 5.14Izumi ProductsIkena Oncology, Inc. - 14, 22.14Ikena OncologyImagine Scientific, Inc. - 14, 19.79Imagine ScientificImmutrix Therapeutics, Inc. - 14, 14.93Immutrix Therapeu…Implant Direct Sybron International LLC - 14, 10.14Implant Direct Sy…Igneous Systems, Inc. - 14, 26.21Igneous Systems
Igneous vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Igneous's grants concentrate

Igneous Systems, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 78.6% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Igneous sits between Itire, LLC and Implant Direct Sybron International LLC.

Who files at Igneous's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Igneous holds 14 patents at rank #19,916, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Igneous

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,916 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Igneous's primary technology class.

Igneous's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2015201620172019 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Igneous Systems, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 7 50.0%
2016 5 35.7%
2017 1 7.1%
2019 1 7.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Igneous Systems, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Igneous Systems, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 78.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #19,888 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Igneous Systems, Inc. against Itire, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.