Where does ID Lab rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), ID Lab ranks #47,581 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does ID Lab hold?

ID Lab holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2020, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is ID Lab's Innovation Score?

ID Lab has an Innovation Score of 30.8 out of 100 (35th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does ID Lab focus on?

ID Lab's top technology area is A41D (OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories) with 2 patents, ranking #232 of 582 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is ID Lab's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

ID Lab's recent grant velocity is -75% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for ID Lab's patents?

ID Lab's patents average 21.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the ID Lab patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

ID Lab

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A41D (OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, ID ranks #47,581 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 11 technology areas.

#47,581
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 35th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.8/100): 21.4
avg claims per patent: -75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R47581 · Foreign Corporation #47,581 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #47,581/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH ICB Pharma Spolka…
CPC-FOCUS A41D · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -75% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How ID’s 30.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (20%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (38%) Claim depth 12.8 pts (42%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
ID Lab · this assignee

31
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows ID's Innovation Score is 30.8/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for ID?

Each dot is one of ID’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ID’s own 21.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 9.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

ID vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where ID's grants concentrate

ID Lab is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under A41D (OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, ID sits between ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski and IDM Tooling, LLC.

ICB Pharma Spolka…

5
ICE House America

5
ICE IP

5
Icon Clinical Res…

5
ID Quantique

5
IDE Water

5
Idid Tecnologia L…

5
IDM Tooling

5
ID Lab ◀

5

What this shows ID holds 5 patents at rank #47,583, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near ID

By rank, the assignees closest to #47,583 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A41D (Outerwear)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in ID's primary technology class.

ID's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

ID Lab patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	40.0%
2016	1	20.0%
2017	1	20.0%
2020	1	20.0%

Which technologies does ID Lab patent most?

A41D - OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories 2

A63B - Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment 2

F41H - ARMOUR; Armoured TURRETS; Armoured OR Armed VEHICLES; Means OF Attack OR Defence, e.g. Camouflage, IN General 1

A62B - Devices, Apparatus OR Methods FOR Life-saving 1

A41B - SHIRTS; UNDERWEAR; Baby LINEN; Handkerchiefs 1

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 1

A45D - Hairdressing OR Shaving Equipment ; Equipment FOR Cosmetics OR Cosmetic Treatments, e.g. FOR Manicuring OR Pedicuring 1

A61H - Physical Therapy Apparatus, e.g. Devices FOR Locating OR Stimulating Reflex Points IN THE BODY; Artificial RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; Bathing Devices FOR Special Therapeutic OR Hygienic Purposes OR Specific Parts OF THE Body 1

A61K - Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes 1

A61M - Devices FOR Introducing Media Into, OR Onto, THE Body ; Devices FOR Transducing Body Media OR FOR Taking Media From THE Body ; Devices FOR Producing OR Ending Sleep OR Stupor 1

A61N - ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

ID Lab's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

ID Lab's lead technology class is A41D (OUTERWEAR; Protective GARMENTS; Accessories), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A41D
Ranked #47,581 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare ID Lab against ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.