Icon Bioscience, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Icon ranks #29,040 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #29,040
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 16th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.0/100)
- 12.7
- avg claims per patent
- -50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29040 · US Corporation #29,040 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,040/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ibur
- CPC-NARROW A61P · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.0/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ibur, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Icon’s 25.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Icon
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Icon Bioscience · this assignee 25
Icon Bioscience · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Icon's Innovation Score is 25.0/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Icon?
Each dot is one of Icon’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Icon’s own 12.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Icon's grants concentrate
Icon Bioscience, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 55.6% of grants classified under A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Icon sits between Ibur, LLC and Idsc Holdings LLC.
Icon's three-year grant acceleration
Icon Bioscience, Inc. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Icon's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ibur
Ibur, LLC
9 patents
- ICA Trinova
ICA TriNova, LLC
9 patents
- Icare Finland OY
Icare Finland OY
9 patents
- ICG Licensing
ICG Licensing LLC
9 patents
- Icos
Icos Corporation
9 patents
- ID Pharma
ID Pharma Co., Ltd.
9 patents
- IDM Global
IDM Global, Inc.
9 patents
- Idsc Holdings
Idsc Holdings LLC
9 patents
- Icon Bioscience ◀
Icon Bioscience, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Icon holds 9 patents at rank #29,024, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Icon
By rank, the assignees closest to #29,024 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Me…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Icon's primary technology class.
- The Regents of the University of California 1,387 in class
- Novartis AG 1,071 in class
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 889 in class
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 879 in class
- Genentech, Inc. 789 in class
- The Board of Regents of the University of Texas System 744 in class
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. 722 in class
- The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services 721 in class
Icon's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2017 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2018 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Icon Bioscience, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Icon Bioscience, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Icon Bioscience, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations), 55.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61P
- Ranked #29,040 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Icon Bioscience, Inc. against Ibur, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.