iBenzer Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, ibenzer ranks #40,820 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #40,820
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
- 5.5
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40820 · US Corporation #40,820 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,820/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH eduPresent
- CPC-NARROW F16M · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2023 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: eduPresent LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How ibenzer’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around ibenzer
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- iBenzer · this assignee 30
iBenzer · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows ibenzer's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for ibenzer?
Each dot is one of ibenzer’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ibenzer’s own 5.5 claims/patent is at or below the 12.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where ibenzer's grants concentrate
iBenzer Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports). Peak complete grant year is 2023 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, ibenzer sits between eduPresent LLC and iMEDI Plus Inc..
ibenzer's three-year grant acceleration
iBenzer Inc. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at iBenzer's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- edupresent
eduPresent LLC
6 patents
- eyebrain Medical
eyeBrain Medical, Inc.
6 patents
- fischer Rohrtechn…
fischer Rohrtechnik GmbH
6 patents
- hubergroup Deutsc…
hubergroup Deutschland GmbH
6 patents
- icad
iCAD, Inc.
6 patents
- icell Gene Therap…
iCell Gene Therapeutics LLC
6 patents
- idonate
iDonate LLC
6 patents
- imedi Plus
iMEDI Plus Inc.
6 patents
- ibenzer ◀
iBenzer Inc.
6 patents
What this shows iBenzer holds 6 patents at rank #44,255, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near iBenzer
By rank, the assignees closest to #44,255 in granted patent volume.
- eduPresent LLC #44,251 · 6 patents
- eyeBrain Medical, Inc. #44,252 · 6 patents
- fischer Rohrtechnik GmbH #44,253 · 6 patents
- hubergroup Deutschland GmbH #44,254 · 6 patents
- iCAD, Inc. #44,256 · 6 patents
- iCell Gene Therapeutics LLC #44,257 · 6 patents
- iDonate LLC #44,258 · 6 patents
- iMEDI Plus Inc. #44,259 · 6 patents
Leaders in F16M (Frames)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in iBenzer's primary technology class.
ibenzer's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2023 | 3 | 50.0% |
Which technologies does iBenzer Inc. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
iBenzer Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- iBenzer Inc.'s lead technology class is F16M (Frames, Casings OR Beds OF Engines, Machines OR Apparatus, NOT Specific TO Engines, Machines OR Apparatus Provided FOR ELSEWHERE; STANDS; Supports), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16M
- Ranked #40,820 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare iBenzer Inc. against eduPresent LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.