IB Korea Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, IB ranks #47,569 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.
- #47,569
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.7/100)
- 16.6
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47569 · Foreign Corporation #47,569 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,569/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Hüttlin
- CPC-NARROW G06V · 5 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Hüttlin GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How IB’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around IB
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- IB Korea · this assignee 31
IB Korea · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows IB's Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for IB?
Each dot is one of IB’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). IB’s own 16.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where IB's grants concentrate
IB Korea Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, IB sits between Hüttlin GmbH and ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski.
IB's three-year grant acceleration
IB Korea Co., Ltd. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at IB's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Hüttlin
Hüttlin GmbH
5 patents
- I-MC
I-MC
5 patents
- I P Solutions
I.P Solutions, Ltd
5 patents
- I Q JOE
I.Q. JOE, LLC
5 patents
- Ibacos
Ibacos, Inc.
5 patents
- Ibix S R L
Ibix S.R.L.
5 patents
- Ic-medtech
IC-MedTech Corp.
5 patents
- ICB Pharma Spolka…
ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski
5 patents
- IB Korea ◀
IB Korea Co., Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows IB holds 5 patents at rank #47,575, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near IB
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,575 in granted patent volume.
- Hüttlin GmbH #47,571 · 5 patents
- I-MC #47,572 · 5 patents
- I.P Solutions, Ltd #47,573 · 5 patents
- I.Q. JOE, LLC #47,574 · 5 patents
- Ibacos, Inc. #47,576 · 5 patents
- Ibix S.R.L. #47,577 · 5 patents
- IC-MedTech Corp. #47,578 · 5 patents
- ICB Pharma Spolka Jawna Tomasz Swietoslawski, Pawel Swietoslawski #47,579 · 5 patents
Leaders in G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in IB's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 3,022 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,565 in class
- Google LLC 1,829 in class
- NEC Corporation 1,631 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 1,549 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 1,310 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 1,287 in class
- Apple Inc. 1,177 in class
IB's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does IB Korea Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 5 of 5 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
IB Korea Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- IB Korea Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06V (Image OR Video Recognition OR Understanding), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06V
- Ranked #47,569 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare IB Korea Co., Ltd. against Hüttlin GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.