I. MER Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B41F (Printing Machines OR Presses).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, I. ranks #18,742 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #18,742
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.7/100)
- 8.3
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R18742 · Foreign Corporation #18,742 · 15 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
- MID-PACK #18,742/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH House of Design
- CPC-FOCUS B41F · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: House of Design LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How I.’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around I.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- I MER · this assignee 31
I MER · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows I.'s Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for I.?
Each dot is one of I.’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). I.’s own 8.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where I.'s grants concentrate
I. MER Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B41F (Printing Machines OR Presses). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, I. sits between House of Design LLC and IDev Technologies, Inc..
I.'s three-year grant acceleration
I. MER Co., Ltd. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at I's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- House of Design
House of Design LLC
15 patents
- Hubbardton Forge
Hubbardton Forge, LLC.
15 patents
- Hunting Energy Se…
Hunting Energy Services, LLC
15 patents
- Hydro Internation…
Hydro International Ltd
15 patents
- I D Systems
I.D. Systems, Inc.
15 patents
- IAM Robotics
IAM Robotics, LLC
15 patents
- Icon Vehicle Dyna…
Icon Vehicle Dynamics LLC
15 patents
- Idev
IDev Technologies, Inc.
15 patents
- I MER ◀
I. MER Co., Ltd.
15 patents
What this shows I. holds 15 patents at rank #18,740, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near I
By rank, the assignees closest to #18,740 in granted patent volume.
- House of Design LLC #18,736 · 15 patents
- Hubbardton Forge, LLC. #18,737 · 15 patents
- Hunting Energy Services, LLC #18,738 · 15 patents
- Hydro International Ltd #18,739 · 15 patents
- I.D. Systems, Inc. #18,741 · 15 patents
- IAM Robotics, LLC #18,742 · 15 patents
- Icon Vehicle Dynamics LLC #18,743 · 15 patents
- IDev Technologies, Inc. #18,744 · 15 patents
Leaders in B41F (Printing Machines OR Presses)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in I's primary technology class.
I.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2018 | 4 | 26.7% |
| 2019 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2020 | 2 | 13.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 6.7% |
| 2022 | 3 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does I. MER Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
I. MER Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- I. MER Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is B41F (Printing Machines OR Presses), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B41F
- Ranked #18,742 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare I. MER Co., Ltd. against House of Design LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.