HyperX Logic, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2025–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Hyperx ranks #47,556 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #47,556
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 25th percentile
- by Innovation Score (27.8/100)
- 19.4
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47556 · US Corporation #47,556 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,556/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH HÖGANÄS Germany
- CPC-NARROW H04L · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 27.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2025–2025 · 1y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: HÖGANÄS Germany GMBH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Hyperx’s 27.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Hyperx
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- HyperX Logic · this assignee 28
HyperX Logic · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Hyperx's Innovation Score is 27.8/100 (25th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Hyperx?
Each dot is one of Hyperx’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Hyperx’s own 19.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Hyperx's grants concentrate
HyperX Logic, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication). By volume, Hyperx sits between Hydrolix Inc. and HÖGANÄS Germany GMBH.
Who files at HyperX's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Hydrolix
Hydrolix Inc.
5 patents
- Hydropac/Lab Prod…
Hydropac/Lab Products, Inc.
5 patents
- Hyloris Pharmaceu…
Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA
5 patents
- Hyper Labs
Hyper Labs, Inc.
5 patents
- Hyperform
Hyperform, Inc.
5 patents
- Hyperion Catalysi…
Hyperion Catalysis International
5 patents
- Hyupjinconnector
Hyupjinconnector Co., Ltd
5 patents
- HÖGANÄS Germany
HÖGANÄS Germany GMBH
5 patents
- Hyperx Logic ◀
HyperX Logic, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows HyperX holds 5 patents at rank #47,565, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near HyperX
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,565 in granted patent volume.
- Hydrolix Inc. #47,561 · 5 patents
- Hydropac/Lab Products, Inc. #47,562 · 5 patents
- Hyloris Pharmaceuticals SA #47,563 · 5 patents
- Hyper Labs, Inc. #47,564 · 5 patents
- Hyperform, Inc. #47,566 · 5 patents
- Hyperion Catalysis International #47,567 · 5 patents
- Hyupjinconnector Co., Ltd #47,568 · 5 patents
- HÖGANÄS Germany GMBH #47,569 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in HyperX's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 15,969 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 13,594 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 11,697 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 10,543 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 9,062 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 8,543 in class
- Cisco Technology, Inc. 7,502 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 7,301 in class
Hyperx's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 25th percentile higher than 25% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2025–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2025partial year | 5 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does HyperX Logic, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
HyperX Logic, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- HyperX Logic, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04L (Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04L
- Ranked #47,556 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare HyperX Logic, Inc. against Hydrolix Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 27.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.