Overall rank by patents
#28,960
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 1 technology areas, active 2018–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B26B (HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Hybrid holds 9 US patents across 1 technology areas, rank #28,960 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Hybrid Razor Ltd. has been granted 9 US utility patents between 2018 and 2023, placing Hybrid Razor Ltd. at rank #28,960 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 1 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 17.1 claims per patent with primary concentration in B26B (HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOLS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a Foreign Corporation, Hybrid Razor Ltd. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Hybrid sits between Human Genome Sciences, Inc. (9 patents, rank #28,956) and Hamlet Protein A/s (9 patents, rank #28,964) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 5 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +25% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Hybrid Razor Ltd.'s 17.1 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while specialization in 1 subclass reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Hybrid Razor Ltd. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
HUMAN GENOME SCIENCES, INC.
9 patents
HUNAN VATHIN MEDICAL INSTRUMENT CO., LTD.
9 patents
HUNTER'S SPECIALTIES, INC.
9 patents
HUSKY LINERS, INC.
9 patents
HYDAC FILTER SYSTEMS GMBH
9 patents
HYGLOS INVEST GMBH
9 patents
HYUNDAI POWERTECH CO., LTD.
9 patents
Hamlet Protein A/S
9 patents
HYBRID RAZOR LTD.
9 patents
What this shows Hybrid holds 9 patents at rank #28,960, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,960 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hybrid's primary technology class.
Hybrid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 82% higher than 18% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,960
Across all tracked assignees
25.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Hybrid's 9 grants land it in the top 82% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.