Hybrid Razor Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Hybrid ranks #29,021 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 1 technology areas.
- #29,021
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 18th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.8/100)
- 17.1
- avg claims per patent
- +25%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R29021 · Foreign Corporation #29,021 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #29,021/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Hamlet Protein A/S
- CPC-NARROW B26B · 1 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +25% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Hamlet Protein A/S (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Hybrid’s 25.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Hybrid
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Hybrid Razor · this assignee 26
Hybrid Razor · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Hybrid's Innovation Score is 25.8/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Hybrid?
Each dot is one of Hybrid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Hybrid’s own 17.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Hybrid's grants concentrate
Hybrid Razor Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 88.9% of grants classified under B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Hybrid sits between Human Genome Sciences, Inc. and Hamlet Protein A/S.
Hybrid's three-year grant acceleration
Hybrid Razor Ltd. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Hybrid's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Human Genome Scie…
Human Genome Sciences, Inc.
9 patents
- Hunan Vathin Medi…
Hunan Vathin Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.
9 patents
- Hunter's Specialt…
Hunter's Specialties, Inc.
9 patents
- Husky Liners
Husky Liners, Inc.
9 patents
- Hydac Filter Syst…
Hydac Filter Systems GMBH
9 patents
- Hyglos Invest
Hyglos Invest GMBH
9 patents
- Hyundai Powertech
Hyundai Powertech Co., Ltd.
9 patents
- Hamlet Protein A/S
Hamlet Protein A/S
9 patents
- Hybrid Razor ◀
Hybrid Razor Ltd.
9 patents
What this shows Hybrid holds 9 patents at rank #28,960, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Hybrid
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,960 in granted patent volume.
- Human Genome Sciences, Inc. #28,956 · 9 patents
- Hunan Vathin Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. #28,957 · 9 patents
- Hunter's Specialties, Inc. #28,958 · 9 patents
- Husky Liners, Inc. #28,959 · 9 patents
- Hydac Filter Systems GMBH #28,961 · 9 patents
- Hyglos Invest GMBH #28,962 · 9 patents
- Hyundai Powertech Co., Ltd. #28,963 · 9 patents
- Hamlet Protein A/S #28,964 · 9 patents
Leaders in B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hybrid's primary technology class.
Hybrid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Hybrid Razor Ltd. patent most?
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Hybrid Razor Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Hybrid Razor Ltd.'s lead technology class is B26B (Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 88.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B26B
- Ranked #29,021 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Hybrid Razor Ltd. against Human Genome Sciences, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.