USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Healthlead Corporation Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Healthlead ranks #17,737 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 0 technology areas.

#17,737
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
34th percentile
by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17737 · Foreign Corporation #17,737 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
  • MID-PACK #17,737/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Hanwha Q Cells
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Hanwha Q Cells GMBH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Healthlead’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Healthlead

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Healthlead's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Healthlead?

Each dot is one of Healthlead’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Healthlead’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 13.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Healthlead vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 15.915.91616.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Hanwha Q Cells GMBH - 16, 11Hanwha Q CellsHass Corporation - 16, 8HassHCMed Innovations Co., Ltd. - 16, 11.69Hcmed InnovationsHDT Bio Corp. - 16, 30.94HDT BioHED Technologies Sarl - 16, 16.31HED SarlHEP Tech Co., Ltd. - 16, 13.44HEP TechHeraeus Quartz North America LLC - 16, 13.38Heraeus Quartz No…HID Global CID SAS - 16, 18.44HID Global CID SASHealthlead Corporation Limited - 16, 1Healthlead
Healthlead vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Healthlead's grants concentrate

Healthlead Corporation Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2023 (10 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2022. By volume, Healthlead sits between Hanwha Q Cells GMBH and HID Global CID SAS.

Healthlead's three-year grant acceleration

Healthlead Corporation Limited shows 12 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Healthlead's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Healthlead holds 16 patents at rank #17,731, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Healthlead

By rank, the assignees closest to #17,731 in granted patent volume.

Healthlead's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 202220232025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Healthlead Corporation Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 2 12.5%
2023 10 62.5%
2025partial year 4 25.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Healthlead Corporation Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #17,737 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Healthlead Corporation Limited against Hanwha Q Cells GMBH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.