Haynes International, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C22C (Alloys).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Haynes ranks #26,448 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #26,448
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 49th percentile
- by Innovation Score (34.8/100)
- 12.0
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26448 · US Corporation #26,448 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,448/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Hankkija Oy
- CPC-NARROW C22C · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 34.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 12.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Hankkija Oy (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Haynes’s 34.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Haynes
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Haynes International · this assignee
Haynes International · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Haynes's Innovation Score is 34.8/100 (49th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Haynes?
Each dot is one of Haynes’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Haynes’s own 12.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Haynes's grants concentrate
Haynes International, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under C22C (Alloys). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Haynes sits between Hankkija Oy and Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf.
Haynes's three-year grant acceleration
Haynes International, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Haynes's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Hankkija Oy
Hankkija Oy
10 patents
- Hankscraft
Hankscraft, Inc.
10 patents
- Hanover Prest-pav…
Hanover Prest-Paving Company
10 patents
- Harken Incorporat…
Harken, Incorporated
10 patents
- Healthstream
HealthStream, Inc.
10 patents
- Hearth Hounds
Hearth Hounds, LLC
10 patents
- Heatworks
Heatworks Technologies, Inc.
10 patents
- Heinrich-heine-un…
Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf
10 patents
- Haynes Internatio… ◀
Haynes International, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows Haynes holds 10 patents at rank #26,477, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Haynes
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,477 in granted patent volume.
- Hankkija Oy #26,473 · 10 patents
- Hankscraft, Inc. #26,474 · 10 patents
- Hanover Prest-Paving Company #26,475 · 10 patents
- Harken, Incorporated #26,476 · 10 patents
- HealthStream, Inc. #26,478 · 10 patents
- Hearth Hounds, LLC #26,479 · 10 patents
- Heatworks Technologies, Inc. #26,480 · 10 patents
- Heinrich-Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf #26,481 · 10 patents
Leaders in C22C (Alloys)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Haynes's primary technology class.
Haynes's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 49th percentile higher than 49% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2018 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2020 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does Haynes International, Inc. patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Haynes International, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Haynes International, Inc.'s lead technology class is C22C (Alloys), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C22C
- Ranked #26,448 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Haynes International, Inc. against Hankkija Oy, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 34.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.