USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Hay ApS

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 46 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Hay ranks #7,145 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 46 patents across 0 technology areas.

#7,145
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.6/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7145 · Foreign Corporation #7,145 · 46 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-SMALL 46 grants
  • UPPER-Q #7,145/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Gamesa Innovation &…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 32.6/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S. L. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Hay’s 32.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Hay

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Hay's Innovation Score is 32.6/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Hay?

Each dot is one of Hay’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Hay’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 10.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Hay vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 45.946.046.04646.046.046.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S. L. - 46, 11.39Gamesa Innovation…GE Jenbacher GmbH Co OG - 46, 14.72GE Jenbacher OGHorteve Breeding BV - 46, 1Horteve Breeding…Harro Hoefliger Verpackungsmaschinen GmbH - 46, 10.54Harro Hoefliger V…Hisense Laser Display Co., Ltd - 46, 18.33Hisense Laser Dis…I-tek Metal MFG. Co., Ltd. - 46, 7.65I-tek Metal MFGIO Tech Group Ltd. - 46, 14.48IO Tech GroupJ. Wagner GmbH - 46, 9.54J WagnerHay ApS - 46, 1Hay Aps
Hay vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Hay's grants concentrate

Hay ApS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2022 (13 grants) versus a trough of 3 in 2020. By volume, Hay sits between Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S. L. and J. Wagner GmbH.

Hay's three-year grant acceleration

Hay ApS shows 28 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Hay's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Hay holds 46 patents at rank #7,146, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Hay

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,146 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Hay, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Hay's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

051015 202020212022202320242025 8
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Hay ApS patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 3 6.5%
2021 7 15.2%
2022 13 28.3%
2023 10 21.7%
2024 5 10.9%
2025partial year 8 17.4%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Hay ApS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #7,145 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Hay ApS against Gamesa Innovation & Technology, S. L., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 32.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.