Where does Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. ranks #31,883 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. hold?

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 44.4 out of 100 (top 26% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s patents?

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s patents average 13.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. focus on?

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s top technology area is B28B (Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster) with 5 patents. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Q: How is the Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B28B (Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Hawkeyepedershaab ranks #31,883 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 6 technology areas.

#31,883
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 26%
by Innovation Score (44.4/100): 13.5
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31883 · US Corporation #31,883 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,883/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Harrier
CPC-NARROW B28B · 6 areas
INNOV-PAR 44.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Harrier Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Hawkeyepedershaab… · this assignee

44
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Hawkeyepedershaab's Innovation Score is 44.4/100 (top 26% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Where Hawkeyepedershaab's grants concentrate

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 62.5% of grants classified under B28B (Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Hawkeyepedershaab sits between Harrier Technologies, Inc. and Healthstream Taiwan Inc..

Hawkeyepedershaab's three-year grant acceleration

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Harrier

8
Harxon

8
Hausfame

8
Havi Global Solut…

8
HDS Trading

8
Healios K K

8
Health Beacons

8
Healthstream Taiw…

8
Hawkeyepedershaab… ◀

8

What this shows Hawkeyepedershaab holds 8 patents at rank #31,868, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Hawkeyepedershaab

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,868 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B28B (Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic Compositions)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Hawkeyepedershaab's primary technology class.

Hawkeyepedershaab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	3	37.5%
2021	1	12.5%
2022	1	12.5%
2023	1	12.5%
2024	1	12.5%
2025partial year	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. patent most?

B28B - Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster 5

E04C - Structural ELEMENTS; Building Materials 4

F04C - Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Machines FOR Liquids ; Rotary-piston, OR Oscillating-piston, Positive-displacement Pumps 2

F16L - PIPES; Joints OR Fittings FOR PIPES; Supports FOR Pipes, Cables OR Protective TUBING; Means FOR Thermal Insulation IN General 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

E01D - Construction OF Bridges, ; Elevated ROADWAYS; OR VIADUCTS; Assembly OF Bridges 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#31,883

of 49,997 tracked assignees

Innovation Score

44.4 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc.'s lead technology class is B28B (Shaping Clay OR Other Ceramic COMPOSITIONS; Shaping SLAG; Shaping Mixtures Containing Cementitious Material, e.g. Plaster), 62.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B28B
Ranked #31,883 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Hawkeyepedershaab Concrete Technologies, Inc. against Harrier Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 44.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.