Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Handle ranks #35,625 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 10 technology areas.
- #35,625
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.9/100)
- 5.9
- avg claims per patent
- +33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35625 · Foreign Corporation #35,625 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,625/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Hammel Companies
- CPC-FOCUS A01M · 10 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-UP +33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Hammel Companies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Handle’s 21.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Handle
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Handle Tech (SZ) · this assignee 22
Handle Tech (SZ) · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Handle's Innovation Score is 21.9/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Handle?
Each dot is one of Handle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Handle’s own 5.9 claims/patent is at or below the 13.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Handle's grants concentrate
Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 42.9% of grants classified under A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Handle sits between Hammel Companies, Inc. and Harbour Star International Limited.
Who files at Handle's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Hammel Companies
Hammel Companies, Inc.
7 patents
- Hammerhead Indust…
Hammerhead Industries, Inc.
7 patents
- Hanam Artec
Hanam Artec Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Handa Oncology
Handa Oncology, LLC
7 patents
- Hank Technology
Hank Technology LLC
7 patents
- Hanon Systems Bad…
Hanon Systems Bad Homburg GmbH
7 patents
- Hans Künz
Hans Künz GmbH
7 patents
- Harbour Star Inte…
Harbour Star International Limited
7 patents
- Handle Tech (SZ) ◀
Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows Handle holds 7 patents at rank #35,698, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Handle
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,698 in granted patent volume.
- Hammel Companies, Inc. #35,694 · 7 patents
- Hammerhead Industries, Inc. #35,695 · 7 patents
- Hanam Artec Co., Ltd. #35,696 · 7 patents
- Handa Oncology, LLC #35,697 · 7 patents
- Hank Technology LLC #35,699 · 7 patents
- Hanon Systems Bad Homburg GmbH #35,700 · 7 patents
- Hans Künz GmbH #35,701 · 7 patents
- Harbour Star International Limited #35,702 · 7 patents
Leaders in A01M (Catching)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Handle's primary technology class.
Handle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 42.9% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 42.9% |
Which technologies does Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd. patent most?
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is A01M (Catching, Trapping OR Scaring OF Animals ; Apparatus FOR THE Destruction OF Noxious Animals OR Noxious Plants), 42.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01M
- Ranked #35,625 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Handle Tech (SZ) Co., Ltd. against Hammel Companies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.