hand2mind, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G01G (Weighing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, hand2mind ranks #35,623 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #35,623
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 43%
- by Innovation Score (37.7/100)
- 7.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35623 · US Corporation #35,623 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,623/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH eBrands Global Oy
- CPC-NARROW G01G · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 37.7/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2022–2024 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: eBrands Global Oy (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How hand2mind’s 37.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around hand2mind
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- hand2mind · this assignee
hand2mind · this assignee
38 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows hand2mind's Innovation Score is 37.7/100 (top 43% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for hand2mind?
Each dot is one of hand2mind’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). hand2mind’s own 7.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where hand2mind's grants concentrate
hand2mind, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 14.3% of grants classified under G01G (Weighing). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2024. By volume, hand2mind sits between eBrands Global Oy and iOnRoad Technologies, Ltd..
hand2mind's three-year grant acceleration
hand2mind, Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at hand2mind's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- ebrands Global Oy
eBrands Global Oy
7 patents
- enow
eNow, Inc.
7 patents
- eturbotouch Techn…
eTurboTouch Technology Inc.
7 patents
- euglena
euglena Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- i2dx
i2Dx, Inc.
7 patents
- idtx Systems
iDTx Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- ifirst Medical
iFirst Medical Technologies, Inc.
7 patents
- ionroad
iOnRoad Technologies, Ltd.
7 patents
- hand2mind ◀
hand2mind, Inc.
7 patents
What this shows hand2mind holds 7 patents at rank #38,453, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near hand2mind
By rank, the assignees closest to #38,453 in granted patent volume.
- eBrands Global Oy #38,449 · 7 patents
- eNow, Inc. #38,450 · 7 patents
- eTurboTouch Technology Inc. #38,451 · 7 patents
- euglena Co., Ltd. #38,452 · 7 patents
- i2Dx, Inc. #38,454 · 7 patents
- iDTx Systems, Inc. #38,455 · 7 patents
- iFirst Medical Technologies, Inc. #38,456 · 7 patents
- iOnRoad Technologies, Ltd. #38,457 · 7 patents
Leaders in G01G (Weighing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in hand2mind's primary technology class.
- Ishida Co., Ltd. 72 in class
- Mettler-Toledo GmbH 57 in class
- Yamato Scale Co., Ltd. 39 in class
- A&D Company, Limited 30 in class
- Sartorius LAB Instruments GMBH & Co. KG 29 in class
- Bizerba SE & Co. KG 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo (Changzhou) Precision Instruments Ltd. 28 in class
- Mettler-Toledo International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 28 in class
hand2mind's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
38 Top 43% higher than 57% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 57.1% |
| 2023 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does hand2mind, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
hand2mind, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- hand2mind, Inc.'s lead technology class is G01G (Weighing), 14.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G01G
- Ranked #35,623 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare hand2mind, Inc. against eBrands Global Oy, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 37.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.