USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Gymshark Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2022–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Gymshark ranks #18,694 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 0 technology areas.

#18,694
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.2/100)
1.0
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R18694 · Foreign Corporation #18,694 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
  • MID-PACK #18,694/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Green Revolution…
  • CPC-UNK CPC blank
  • INNOV-THIN 30.2/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2022–2025 · 4y
  • BOOK-RICH 8/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Gymshark’s 30.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Gymshark

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Gymshark's Innovation Score is 30.2/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Gymshark?

Each dot is one of Gymshark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Gymshark’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 6.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Gymshark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 14.914.91515.1 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. - 15, 16.73Green Revolution…Greene, Tweed Technologies, Inc. - 15, 25.6Greene TweedGuangdong Haixing Plastic & Rubber Co., Ltd. - 15, 1Guangdong Haixing…Guehring OHG - 15, 18.73Guehring OHGH-P Products, Inc. - 15, 14.87H-P ProductsHaihong Electric Co., Ltd. - 15, 4.87Haihong ElectricHain YO Enterprises Co., Ltd. - 15, 6Hain YO Enterpris…Hangzhou Everich Houseware Co., Ltd. - 15, 1Hangzhou Everich…Gymshark Limited - 15, 1Gymshark
Gymshark vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Gymshark's grants concentrate

Gymshark Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (10 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Gymshark sits between Green Revolution Cooling, Inc. and Hangzhou Everich Houseware Co., Ltd..

Gymshark's three-year grant acceleration

Gymshark Limited shows 12 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Gymshark's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Gymshark holds 15 patents at rank #18,692, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Gymshark

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,692 in granted patent volume.

Gymshark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

024681012 2022202320242025 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2022–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2022–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Gymshark Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2022 1 6.7%
2023 1 6.7%
2024 10 66.7%
2025partial year 3 20.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Gymshark Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Ranked #18,694 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Gymshark Limited against Green Revolution Cooling, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 30.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.