USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Group-a Autosports, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 1 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Group-a ranks #26,414 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 1 technology areas.

#26,414
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
2nd percentile
by Innovation Score (14.0/100)
3.6
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R26414 · US Corporation #26,414 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
  • MID-PACK #26,414/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Graff Diamonds
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 1 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 14.0/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Graff Diamonds SA (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Group-a’s 14.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Group-a

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Group-a's Innovation Score is 14.0/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Group-a?

Each dot is one of Group-a’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Group-a’s own 3.6 claims/patent is at or below the 11.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Group-a vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 9.99.91010.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Graff Diamonds SA - 10, 1Graff DiamondsGramercy Extremity Orthopedics LLC - 10, 19.6Gramercy Extremit…Grayhill, Inc. - 10, 17.6GrayhillGreenfield World Trade, Inc. - 10, 11.1Greenfield World…GRS Guide System, Inc. - 10, 6.4GRS Guide SystemGTI Energy - 10, 20.5GTI EnergyGuangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd. - 10, 1.5Guangdong Yingao…Guangdong Zhineng Technology Co., Ltd. - 10, 14.6Guangdong Zhineng…Group-a Autosports, Inc. - 10, 3.6Group-a Autosports
Group-a vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Group-a's grants concentrate

Group-a Autosports, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 1 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2015. By volume, Group-a sits between Graff Diamonds SA and Guangdong Zhineng Technology Co., Ltd..

Who files at Group-a's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Group-a holds 10 patents at rank #26,376, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Group-a

By rank, the assignees closest to #26,376 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Group-a's primary technology class.

Group-a's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

14 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

123456 201520162017 3
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Group-a Autosports, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 2 20.0%
2016 5 50.0%
2017 3 30.0%

Which technologies does Group-a Autosports, Inc. patent most?

Top 1 of 1 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Group-a Autosports, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Group-a Autosports, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #26,414 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Group-a Autosports, Inc. against Graff Diamonds SA, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 14.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.