USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Grantec ranks #19,833 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 4 technology areas.

#19,833
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.6/100)
8.7
avg claims per patent
-25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19833 · Foreign Corporation #19,833 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
  • MID-PACK #19,833/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Gmedelaware 2
  • CPC-NARROW A47C · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.6/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 8.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DOWN -25% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gmedelaware 2 LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Grantec’s 21.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Grantec

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Grantec's Innovation Score is 21.6/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Grantec?

Each dot is one of Grantec’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Grantec’s own 8.7 claims/patent is at or below the 14.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Grantec vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 13.913.91414.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Gmedelaware 2 LLC - 14, 19.14Gmedelaware 2Gneuss GmbH - 14, 11.07GneussGraf Synergy S.r.l. - 14, 12.43Graf Synergy S r lGranite Industries, Inc. - 14, 2.57Granite IndustriesGravystack, Inc. - 14, 18.93GravystackGreenMantra Recycling Technologies Ltd. - 14, 18.79Greenmantra Recyc…Gregory A. Pearson, Inc. - 14, 16.36Gregory A PearsonGrid Logic Incorporated - 14, 14.86Grid Logic Incorp…Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd - 14, 8.71Grantec (Xiamen)
Grantec vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Grantec's grants concentrate

Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 92.9% of grants classified under A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Grantec sits between Gmedelaware 2 LLC and Grid Logic Incorporated.

Who files at Grantec's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Grantec holds 14 patents at rank #19,835, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Grantec

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,835 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47C (Chairs)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Grantec's primary technology class.

Grantec's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 201620172018201920202021 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 3 21.4%
2017 2 14.3%
2018 2 14.3%
2019 1 7.1%
2020 4 28.6%
2021 2 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd's lead technology class is A47C (CHAIRS; SOFAS; Beds), 92.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47C
  • Ranked #19,833 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Grantec (Xiamen) Co., Ltd against Gmedelaware 2 LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.