Glam Labs, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2025–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Glam ranks #31,777 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #31,777
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 11th percentile
- by Innovation Score (22.9/100)
- 17.3
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31777 · US Corporation #31,777 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,777/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Gentuity
- CPC-NARROW G06T · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 22.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- SPAN-YRS 2025–2025 · 1y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Gentuity, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Glam’s 22.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Glam
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Glam Labs · this assignee 23
Glam Labs · this assignee
23 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Glam's Innovation Score is 22.9/100 (11th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Glam?
Each dot is one of Glam’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Glam’s own 17.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Glam's grants concentrate
Glam Labs, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General). By volume, Glam sits between Gentuity, LLC and Global Energy Science, LLC.
Who files at Glam's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Gentuity
Gentuity, LLC
8 patents
- Gifu Plastic Indu…
Gifu Plastic Industry Co. Ltd.
8 patents
- Ginsey Industries
Ginsey Industries, Inc.
8 patents
- Giti Radial Tire…
Giti Radial Tire (ANHUI) Company Ltd.
8 patents
- Glaxosmithkline C…
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare GmbH and Co. KG
8 patents
- Glean
Glean Technologies, Inc.
8 patents
- Global Algae Tech…
Global Algae Technology, LLC
8 patents
- Global Energy Sci…
Global Energy Science, LLC
8 patents
- Glam Labs ◀
Glam Labs, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Glam holds 8 patents at rank #31,811, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Glam
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,811 in granted patent volume.
- Gentuity, LLC #31,807 · 8 patents
- Gifu Plastic Industry Co. Ltd. #31,808 · 8 patents
- Ginsey Industries, Inc. #31,809 · 8 patents
- Giti Radial Tire (ANHUI) Company Ltd. #31,810 · 8 patents
- GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare GmbH and Co. KG #31,812 · 8 patents
- Glean Technologies, Inc. #31,813 · 8 patents
- Global Algae Technology, LLC #31,814 · 8 patents
- Global Energy Science, LLC #31,815 · 8 patents
Leaders in G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Glam's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,120 in class
- Canon Kabushiki Kaisha 3,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,522 in class
- Sony Group Corporation 2,484 in class
- Intel Corporation 2,439 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 2,389 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 2,281 in class
- Google LLC 2,182 in class
Glam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
23 11th percentile higher than 11% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2025–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2025partial year | 8 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does Glam Labs, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Glam Labs, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Glam Labs, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06T
- Ranked #31,777 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Glam Labs, Inc. against Gentuity, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 22.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.