GIP AG
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, GIP ranks #47,065 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #47,065
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 35th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.7/100)
- 15.8
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R47065 · Foreign Corporation #47,065 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #47,065/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Gigglicious
- CPC-FOCUS H02J · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Gigglicious, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How GIP’s 30.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around GIP
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- GIP · this assignee 31
GIP · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows GIP's Innovation Score is 30.7/100 (35th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for GIP?
Each dot is one of GIP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). GIP’s own 15.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where GIP's grants concentrate
GIP AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, GIP sits between Gigglicious, LLC and Givegab, Inc..
GIP's three-year grant acceleration
GIP AG shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at GIP's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Gigglicious
Gigglicious, LLC
5 patents
- Gilupi
Gilupi GMBH
5 patents
- Gimatic S P A
Gimatic S.P.A.
5 patents
- Giordano Poultry…
Giordano Poultry Plast S.P.A.
5 patents
- Gipstech S R L
Gipstech S.R.L.
5 patents
- Gita Green
Gita Green, Inc.
5 patents
- Gitr
Gitr, Inc.
5 patents
- Givegab
Givegab, Inc.
5 patents
- GIP ◀
GIP AG
5 patents
What this shows GIP holds 5 patents at rank #47,016, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near GIP
By rank, the assignees closest to #47,016 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distribu…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in GIP's primary technology class.
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha 904 in class
- Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. 657 in class
- Apple Inc. 608 in class
- General Electric Company 590 in class
- Robert Bosch GmbH 437 in class
- Honda Motor Co., Ltd. 404 in class
- Qualcomm Incorporated 393 in class
- Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 368 in class
GIP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 35th percentile higher than 35% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does GIP AG patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
GIP AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- GIP AG's lead technology class is H02J (Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02J
- Ranked #47,065 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare GIP AG against Gigglicious, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.