Where does Genesis III, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Genesis III, Inc. ranks #19,810 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Genesis III, Inc. hold?

Genesis III, Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Genesis III, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Genesis III, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 28.0 out of 100 (26th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Genesis III, Inc. focus on?

Genesis III, Inc.'s top technology area is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain) with 14 patents, ranking #16 of 384 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Genesis III, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Genesis III, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -14% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Genesis III, Inc.'s patents?

Genesis III, Inc.'s patents average 12.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Genesis III, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Genesis III, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Genesis ranks #19,810 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 4 technology areas.

#19,810
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.0/100): 12.6
avg claims per patent: -14%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19810 · US Corporation #19,810 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #19,810/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Gebr Becker
CPC-NARROW B02C · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -14% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Gebr. Becker GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Genesis’s 28.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (34%) Velocity 4.0 pts (14%) Breadth 7.1 pts (25%) Claim depth 7.5 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Genesis III · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Genesis's Innovation Score is 28.0/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Genesis?

Each dot is one of Genesis’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Genesis’s own 12.6 claims/patent is at or below the 15.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Genesis vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Genesis's grants concentrate

Genesis III, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Genesis sits between Gebr. Becker GmbH and Glasswall (IP) Limited.

Genesis's three-year grant acceleration

Genesis III, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Gebr Becker

14
Geico S p A

14
Geltech Solutions

14
General Scientific

14
Genetesis

14
Geofeedia

14
Girnet Internacio…

14
Glasswall (IP)

14
Genesis III ◀

14

What this shows Genesis holds 14 patents at rank #19,824, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Genesis

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,824 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B02C (Crushing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Genesis's primary technology class.

Genesis's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Genesis III, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	14.3%
2016	1	7.1%
2017	2	14.3%
2019	2	14.3%
2020	1	7.1%
2021	2	14.3%
2022	1	7.1%
2023	2	14.3%
2025partial year	1	7.1%

Which technologies does Genesis III, Inc. patent most?

B02C - Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain 14

B23D - PLANING; SLOTTING; SHEARING; BROACHING; SAWING; FILING; SCRAPING; Like Operations FOR Working Metal BY Removing Material, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

B21K - Making Forged OR Pressed Metal Products, e.g. Horse-shoes, Rivets, Bolts OR Wheels 4

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 3

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Genesis III, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Genesis III, Inc.'s lead technology class is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B02C
Ranked #19,810 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Genesis III, Inc. against Gebr. Becker GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.