Where does Full Vision, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Full Vision, Inc. ranks #31,717 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Full Vision, Inc. hold?

Full Vision, Inc. holds 8 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2020, spanning 2 technology areas.

What is Full Vision, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Full Vision, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 17.2 out of 100 (4th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Full Vision, Inc. focus on?

Full Vision, Inc.'s top technology area is B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR) with 3 patents, ranking #782 of 1,969 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 2 CPC subclasses total.

Is Full Vision, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Full Vision, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -86% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Full Vision, Inc.'s patents?

Full Vision, Inc.'s patents average 7.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Full Vision, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Full Vision, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Full ranks #31,717 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.

#31,717
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 4th percentile
by Innovation Score (17.2/100): 7.8
avg claims per patent: -86%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R31717 · US Corporation #31,717 · 8 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
MID-PACK #31,717/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Fu Tai Industry…
CPC-NARROW B60R · 2 areas
INNOV-LOW 17.2/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.8 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -86% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Fu Tai Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Full’s 17.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.6 pts (44%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 5.0 pts (29%) Claim depth 4.7 pts (27%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Applied Electric… · near

17
Garden Genetics · near

17
Full Vision · this assignee

17
Greenkeepers · near

17
Amini Innovation · near

17
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Full's Innovation Score is 17.2/100 (4th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Full?

Each dot is one of Full’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Full’s own 7.8 claims/patent is at or below the 12.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Full vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Full's grants concentrate

Full Vision, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 37.5% of grants classified under B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Full sits between Fu Tai Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. and Fusheng Precision Co., Ltd.

Fu Tai Industry (…

8
Fujifilm Speciali…

8
Fulcrum Therapeut…

8
Fulfil Solutions

8
Fullarmor

8
Fulon Development

8
Fundación para la…

8
Fusheng Precision

8
Full Vision ◀

8

What this shows Full holds 8 patents at rank #31,717, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Full

By rank, the assignees closest to #31,717 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B60R (Vehicles)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Full's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Full, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B60R (Vehicles), Full ranks #782 of 1,969 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (17 here).

Greenkeepers, Inc. 17 Amini Innovation Corporation 17 Garden Genetics LLC 17 Applied Electric Vehicles Pty Ltd 17

Full's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

17 4th percentile higher than 4% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Full Vision, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	12.5%
2017	1	12.5%
2018	3	37.5%
2019	2	25.0%
2020	1	12.5%

Which technologies does Full Vision, Inc. patent most?

B60R - Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 3

B60Y - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Aspects Cross-cutting Vehicle Technology 3

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Full Vision, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Full Vision, Inc.'s lead technology class is B60R (Vehicles, Vehicle Fittings, OR Vehicle Parts, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR), 37.5% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B60R
Ranked #31,717 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Full Vision, Inc. against Fu Tai Industry (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 17.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.