FTI Consulting Technology LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 21 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, FTI ranks #13,992 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 21 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #13,992
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
- 18.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13992 · US Corporation #13,992 · 21 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 21 grants
- MID-PACK #13,992/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Eyenovia
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Eyenovia, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How FTI’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around FTI
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- FTI Consulting… · this assignee 30
FTI Consulting… · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows FTI's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for FTI?
Each dot is one of FTI’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). FTI’s own 18.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where FTI's grants concentrate
FTI Consulting Technology LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 95.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (9 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2018. By volume, FTI sits between EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Fortress Cyber Security, LLC.
Who files at FTI's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Eyepoint Pharmace…
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
21 patents
- Eyenovia
Eyenovia, Inc.
21 patents
- Flashsilicon Inco…
Flashsilicon Incorporation
21 patents
- Freevalve AB
Freevalve AB
21 patents
- Fukuda Metal Foil…
Fukuda Metal Foil & Powder Co., Ltd.
21 patents
- Food Industry Res…
Food Industry Research and Development Institute
21 patents
- Fortanix
Fortanix, Inc.
21 patents
- Fortress Cyber Se…
Fortress Cyber Security, LLC
21 patents
- FTI Consulting Te… ◀
FTI Consulting Technology LLC
21 patents
What this shows FTI holds 21 patents at rank #13,986, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near FTI
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,986 in granted patent volume.
- EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #13,982 · 21 patents
- Eyenovia, Inc. #13,983 · 21 patents
- Flashsilicon Incorporation #13,984 · 21 patents
- Freevalve AB #13,985 · 21 patents
- Fukuda Metal Foil & Powder Co., Ltd. #13,987 · 21 patents
- Food Industry Research and Development Institute #13,988 · 21 patents
- Fortanix, Inc. #13,989 · 21 patents
- Fortress Cyber Security, LLC #13,990 · 21 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in FTI's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
FTI's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 9 | 42.9% |
| 2016 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2017 | 5 | 23.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 9.5% |
Which technologies does FTI Consulting Technology LLC patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
FTI Consulting Technology LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- FTI Consulting Technology LLC's lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 95.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #13,992 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare FTI Consulting Technology LLC against EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.