Where does Forge Laboratories, LLC rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Forge Laboratories, LLC ranks #46,831 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Forge Laboratories, LLC hold?

Forge Laboratories, LLC holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is Forge Laboratories, LLC's Innovation Score?

Forge Laboratories, LLC has an Innovation Score of 27.6 out of 100 (24th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Forge Laboratories, LLC focus on?

Forge Laboratories, LLC's top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 5 patents, ranking #3,118 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is Forge Laboratories, LLC's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Forge Laboratories, LLC's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Forge Laboratories, LLC's patents?

Forge Laboratories, LLC's patents average 11.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Forge Laboratories, LLC patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Forge Laboratories, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Forge ranks #46,831 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 5 technology areas.

#46,831
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 24th percentile
by Innovation Score (27.6/100): 11.4
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46831 · US Corporation #46,831 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #46,831/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Forchem Oy
CPC-NARROW A61B · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 27.6/100
CLAIMS-PAR 11.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Forchem Oy (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Forge’s 27.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (22%) Velocity 6.7 pts (24%) Breadth 7.9 pts (29%) Claim depth 6.8 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Forge Laboratories · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Forge's Innovation Score is 27.6/100 (24th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Forge?

Each dot is one of Forge’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Forge’s own 11.4 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Forge vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Forge's grants concentrate

Forge Laboratories, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, Forge sits between Forchem Oy and Fortis Manufacturing, Inc..

Forge's three-year grant acceleration

Forge Laboratories, LLC shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Forchem Oy

5
Forcome

5
Foreman

5
Forever Oceans

5
Forkbeard AS

5
Formae

5
Fortifyiq

5
Fortis Manufactur…

5
Forge Laboratories ◀

5

What this shows Forge holds 5 patents at rank #46,907, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Forge

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,907 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Forge's primary technology class.

Forge's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 24th percentile higher than 24% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Forge Laboratories, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	2	40.0%
2023	1	20.0%
2024	1	20.0%
2025partial year	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Forge Laboratories, LLC patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 5

H04M - Telephonic Communication 5

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 5

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

H04Q - Selecting 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Forge Laboratories, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Forge Laboratories, LLC's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #46,831 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Forge Laboratories, LLC against Forchem Oy, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 27.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.