Footmarks, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04W (Wireless Communication Networks).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Footmarks ranks #46,823 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #46,823
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 15th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.7/100)
- 20.6
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46823 · US Corporation #46,823 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,823/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Food Grade Solutions
- CPC-NARROW H04W · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.7/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.6 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Food Grade Solutions, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Footmarks’s 24.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Footmarks
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Footmarks · this assignee 25
Footmarks · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Footmarks's Innovation Score is 24.7/100 (15th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Footmarks?
Each dot is one of Footmarks’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Footmarks’s own 20.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 20.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Footmarks's grants concentrate
Footmarks, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04W (Wireless Communication Networks). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Footmarks sits between Food Grade Solutions, LLC and Forcome Co. Ltd..
Who files at Footmarks's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Food Grade Soluti…
Food Grade Solutions, LLC
5 patents
- Food Safety Techn…
Food Safety Technology, LLC
5 patents
- Foodcap Internati…
Foodcap International Limited
5 patents
- Foodmate US
Foodmate US, LLC
5 patents
- Footwear Unlimited
Footwear Unlimited Inc.
5 patents
- Forsight Labs
ForSight Labs, LLC
5 patents
- Forchem Oy
Forchem Oy
5 patents
- Forcome
Forcome Co. Ltd.
5 patents
- Footmarks ◀
Footmarks, Inc.
5 patents
What this shows Footmarks holds 5 patents at rank #46,900, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Footmarks
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,900 in granted patent volume.
- Food Grade Solutions, LLC #46,896 · 5 patents
- Food Safety Technology, LLC #46,897 · 5 patents
- Foodcap International Limited #46,898 · 5 patents
- Foodmate US, LLC #46,899 · 5 patents
- Footwear Unlimited Inc. #46,901 · 5 patents
- ForSight Labs, LLC #46,902 · 5 patents
- Forchem Oy #46,903 · 5 patents
- Forcome Co. Ltd. #46,904 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04W (Wireless Communication Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Footmarks's primary technology class.
- Qualcomm Incorporated 17,987 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 11,683 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 11,202 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 10,885 in class
- Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) 10,282 in class
- Apple Inc. 6,306 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 3,725 in class
- Intel Corporation 3,691 in class
Footmarks's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 15th percentile higher than 15% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2020 | 3 | 60.0% |
Which technologies does Footmarks, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Footmarks, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Footmarks, Inc.'s lead technology class is H04W (Wireless Communication Networks), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04W
- Ranked #46,823 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Footmarks, Inc. against Food Grade Solutions, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.