Where does Fluidic, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Fluidic, Inc. ranks #12,444 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Fluidic, Inc. hold?

Fluidic, Inc. holds 24 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2019, spanning 10 technology areas.

What is Fluidic, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Fluidic, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 37.3 out of 100 (top 44% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Fluidic, Inc. focus on?

Fluidic, Inc.'s top technology area is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy) with 24 patents, ranking #279 of 2,332 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 10 CPC subclasses total.

Is Fluidic, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Fluidic, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Fluidic, Inc.'s patents?

Fluidic, Inc.'s patents average 30.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Fluidic, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Fluidic, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fluidic ranks #12,444 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 10 technology areas.

#12,444
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 44%
by Innovation Score (37.3/100): 30.1
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12444 · US Corporation #12,444 · 24 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
UPPER-Q #12,444/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Faiveley Transport…
CPC-FOCUS H01M · 10 areas
INNOV-THIN 37.3/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 30.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Faiveley Transport Tours (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fluidic’s 37.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.1 pts (30%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.2 pts (30%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (40%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Fluidic · this assignee

37
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Fluidic's Innovation Score is 37.3/100 (top 44% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fluidic?

Each dot is one of Fluidic’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fluidic’s own 30.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Fluidic vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Fluidic's grants concentrate

Fluidic, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Fluidic sits between Fuzetec Technology Co., Ltd. and Global Healthcare Exchange, LLC.

Fuzetec Technology

24
Faiveley Transpor…

24
Fike

24
Florensis B V

24
Fortem

24
Getac Holdings

24
Glenmark Specialty

24
Global Healthcare…

24
Fluidic ◀

24

What this shows Fluidic holds 24 patents at rank #12,451, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Fluidic

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,451 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H01M (Processes OR Means)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fluidic's primary technology class.

Fluidic's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

37 Top 44% higher than 56% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Fluidic, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	8	33.3%
2016	9	37.5%
2017	4	16.7%
2018	2	8.3%
2019	1	4.2%

Which technologies does Fluidic, Inc. patent most?

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 24

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 23

C25B - Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Processes FOR THE Production OF Compounds OR NON-METALS; Apparatus Therefor 5

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 4

H02J - Circuit Arrangements OR Systems FOR Supplying OR Distributing Electric POWER; Systems FOR Storing Electric Energy 3

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

B01F - Mixing, e.g. Dissolving, Emulsifying OR Dispersing 1

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 1

B33Y - Additive Manufacturing, i.e. Manufacturing OF Three-dimensional [3-D] Objects BY Additive Deposition, Additive Agglomeration OR Additive Layering, e.g. BY 3-D Printing, Stereolithography OR Selective Laser Sintering 1

B29C - Shaping OR Joining OF PLASTICS; Shaping OF Material IN A Plastic State, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; After-treatment OF THE Shaped Products, e.g. Repairing 1

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fluidic, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Fluidic, Inc.'s lead technology class is H01M (Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01M
Ranked #12,444 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Fluidic, Inc. against Fuzetec Technology Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 37.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.