Flow Labs, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Flow ranks #31,657 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #31,657
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 9th percentile
- by Innovation Score (21.8/100)
- 15.4
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31657 · US Corporation #31,657 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,657/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH FlexDex
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 21.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: FlexDex, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Flow’s 21.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Flow
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Flow Labs · this assignee 22
Flow Labs · this assignee
22 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Flow's Innovation Score is 21.8/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Flow?
Each dot is one of Flow’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Flow’s own 15.4 claims/patent is at or below the 19.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Flow's grants concentrate
Flow Labs, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Flow sits between FlexDex, Inc. and Fochon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd..
Who files at Flow's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Flexdex
FlexDex, Inc.
8 patents
- Flexus Biosciences
Flexus Biosciences, Inc.
8 patents
- Flint Group
Flint Group, LLC
8 patents
- Flo Free
Flo Free LLC
8 patents
- Fluence Automation
Fluence Automation LLC
8 patents
- Flusso
Flusso Limited
8 patents
- Flying Whales
Flying Whales
8 patents
- Fochon Pharmaceut…
Fochon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.
8 patents
- Flow Labs ◀
Flow Labs, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Flow holds 8 patents at rank #31,681, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Flow
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,681 in granted patent volume.
- FlexDex, Inc. #31,677 · 8 patents
- Flexus Biosciences, Inc. #31,678 · 8 patents
- Flint Group, LLC #31,679 · 8 patents
- Flo Free LLC #31,680 · 8 patents
- Fluence Automation LLC #31,682 · 8 patents
- Flusso Limited #31,683 · 8 patents
- Flying Whales #31,684 · 8 patents
- Fochon Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. #31,685 · 8 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Flow's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
Flow's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 5 | 62.5% |
Which technologies does Flow Labs, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Flow Labs, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Flow Labs, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #31,657 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Flow Labs, Inc. against FlexDex, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 21.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.