PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Fliteboard PTY Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fliteboard ranks #28,771 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.

#28,771
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 31%
by Innovation Score (42.4/100)
12.2
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28771 · Foreign Corporation #28,771 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #28,771/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Finisar Sweden AB
  • CPC-NARROW B63B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-PAR 42.4/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 12.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2020–2025 · 6y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Finisar Sweden AB (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fliteboard’s 42.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Fliteboard

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Fliteboard's Innovation Score is 42.4/100 (top 31% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fliteboard?

Each dot is one of Fliteboard’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fliteboard’s own 12.2 claims/patent is at or below the 17.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Fliteboard vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Finisar Sweden AB - 9, 21.67Finisar Sweden ABFIO Corporation - 9, 22.22FIOFisk University - 9, 19.22Fisk UniversityFlex Films (USA) Inc. - 9, 17.33Flex Films (USA)Forest Laboratories Holdings Limited - 9, 21.56Forest Laboratori…Forma TM, LLC - 9, 17.22Forma TMFortune Grand Technology Inc. - 9, 10.33Fortune Grand Tec…FQ IP AB - 9, 11.78FQ IP ABFliteboard PTY Ltd. - 9, 12.22Fliteboard PTY
Fliteboard vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Fliteboard's grants concentrate

Fliteboard PTY Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Fliteboard sits between Finisar Sweden AB and FQ IP AB.

Fliteboard's three-year grant acceleration

Fliteboard PTY Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Fliteboard's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Fliteboard holds 9 patents at rank #28,740, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Fliteboard

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,740 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fliteboard's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Fliteboard, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne Vessels), Fliteboard ranks #129 of 645 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (42 here).

InstrumentMail, LLC 42 Piramal Pharma Limited 42 Cambridge GAN Devices Limited 42 Touch Bionics Limited 42

Fliteboard's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

42 Top 31% higher than 69% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 20202022202320242025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Fliteboard PTY Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2020 1 11.1%
2022 2 22.2%
2023 1 11.1%
2024 1 11.1%
2025partial year 4 44.4%

Which technologies does Fliteboard PTY Ltd. patent most?

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fliteboard PTY Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Fliteboard PTY Ltd.'s lead technology class is B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B63B
  • Ranked #28,771 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Fliteboard PTY Ltd. against Finisar Sweden AB, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 42.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.