Overall rank by patents
#26,292
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 1 technology areas, active 2016–2023. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS).
The verdict
Flexidrill holds 10 US patents across 1 technology areas, rank #26,292 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Flexidrill Limited has been granted 10 US utility patents between 2016 and 2023, placing Flexidrill Limited at rank #26,292 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 1 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 11.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in E21B (EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS). As a Foreign Corporation, Flexidrill Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Flexidrill sits between Fischer Sports Gmbh (10 patents, rank #26,288) and FMC Separation Systems, BV (10 patents, rank #26,296) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.4/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 4 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -33% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Flexidrill Limited's 11.6 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 1 subclass reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Flexidrill Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
FISCHER SPORTS GMBH
10 patents
FISHBONE PACKAGING INC.
10 patents
FIVE MEDIA MARKETING LIMITED
10 patents
FLEX R&D, INC.
10 patents
FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL KFT.
10 patents
FLOMATIC CORPORATION
10 patents
FLUID-O-TECH S.R.L.
10 patents
FMC Separation Systems, BV
10 patents
FLEXIDRILL LIMITED
10 patents
What this shows Flexidrill holds 10 patents at rank #26,292, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Flexidrill's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 Top 83% higher than 17% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 10.0% |
Top 1 of 1 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#26,292
Across all tracked assignees
25.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Flexidrill's 10 grants land it in the top 83% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.