Where does Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab ranks #15,278 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab hold?

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab holds 19 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2017, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's Innovation Score?

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab has an Innovation Score of 19.8 out of 100 (6th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's recent grant velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's patents?

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's patents average 3.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab

Q: What technology areas does Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab focus on?

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's top technology area is A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering) with 3 patents, ranking #200 of 635 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Fiskars ranks #15,278 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 4 technology areas.

#15,278
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 6th percentile
by Innovation Score (19.8/100): 3.9
avg claims per patent: -100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15278 · Foreign Corporation #15,278 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
MID-PACK #15,278/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Factual
CPC-NARROW A01G · 4 areas
INNOV-LOW 19.8/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 3.9 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -100% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Factual Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Fiskars’s 19.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.3 pts (52%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (36%) Claim depth 2.3 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Fiskars Brands… · this assignee

20
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Fiskars's Innovation Score is 19.8/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fiskars?

Each dot is one of Fiskars’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fiskars’s own 3.9 claims/patent is at or below the 19.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Fiskars vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Fiskars's grants concentrate

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 15.8% of grants classified under A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (13 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Fiskars sits between Factual Inc. and Fluidity Technologies Inc..

Factual

19
Falcon Power

19
Feedzai—Consultad…

19
Figma

19
Fisker

19
Fitesa Germany

19
Fives Intralogist…

19
Fluidity

19
Fiskars Brands Fi… ◀

19

What this shows Fiskars holds 19 patents at rank #15,286, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Fiskars

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,286 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A01G (Horticulture)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Fiskars's primary technology class.

Fiskars's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2017

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	13	68.4%
2016	5	26.3%
2017	1	5.3%

Which technologies does Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab patent most?

A01G - HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering 3

B26B - Hand-held Cutting Tools NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 1

B27L - Removing Bark OR Vestiges OF Branches ; Splitting WOOD; Manufacture OF Veneer, Wooden Sticks, Wood Shavings, Wood Fibres OR Wood Powder 1

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab's lead technology class is A01G (HORTICULTURE; Cultivation OF Vegetables, Flowers, Rice, Fruit, Vines, Hops OR SEAWEED; FORESTRY; Watering), 15.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01G
Ranked #15,278 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Fiskars Brands Finland Oy Ab against Factual Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 19.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.