FEM, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, FEM ranks #40,180 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #40,180
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 18th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.8/100)
- 23.5
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R40180 · US Corporation #40,180 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #40,180/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Faurecia Interior…
- CPC-NARROW G06F · 2 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.8/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 23.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Faurecia Interior Systems India Private Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How FEM’s 25.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around FEM
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- FEM · this assignee 26
FEM · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows FEM's Innovation Score is 25.8/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for FEM?
Each dot is one of FEM’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). FEM’s own 23.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where FEM's grants concentrate
FEM, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). By volume, FEM sits between Faurecia Interior Systems India Private Limited and FFF Enterprises, Inc..
Who files at FEM's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Faurecia Interior…
Faurecia Interior Systems India Private Limited
6 patents
- Fbgs International
Fbgs International NV
6 patents
- FBM Systems AND
FBM Systems AND Electronics, Inc.
6 patents
- Fcet
Fcet, Inc.
6 patents
- Femselect
Femselect Ltd
6 patents
- Feng HE Ying ZAO…
Feng HE Ying ZAO Group Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Fermob
Fermob
6 patents
- FFF Enterprises
FFF Enterprises, Inc.
6 patents
- FEM ◀
FEM, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows FEM holds 6 patents at rank #40,156, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near FEM
By rank, the assignees closest to #40,156 in granted patent volume.
- Faurecia Interior Systems India Private Limited #40,152 · 6 patents
- Fbgs International NV #40,153 · 6 patents
- FBM Systems AND Electronics, Inc. #40,154 · 6 patents
- Fcet, Inc. #40,155 · 6 patents
- Femselect Ltd #40,157 · 6 patents
- Feng HE Ying ZAO Group Co., Ltd. #40,158 · 6 patents
- Fermob #40,159 · 6 patents
- FFF Enterprises, Inc. #40,160 · 6 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in FEM's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
FEM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2017 | 2 | 33.3% |
Which technologies does FEM, Inc. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
FEM, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- FEM, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #40,180 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare FEM, Inc. against Faurecia Interior Systems India Private Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.