Where does Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH ranks #11,648 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH hold?

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH holds 26 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 21 technology areas.

What is Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's Innovation Score?

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH has an Innovation Score of 40.2 out of 100 (top 36% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's recent grant velocity is -70% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's patents?

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's patents average 15.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH

Q: What technology areas does Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH focus on?

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's top technology area is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings) with 25 patents, ranking #53 of 1,334 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 21 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 26 granted patents across 21 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Federal-mogul ranks #11,648 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 26 patents across 21 technology areas.

#11,648
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 36%
by Innovation Score (40.2/100): 15.5
avg claims per patent: -70%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11648 · Foreign Corporation #11,648 · 26 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 26 grants
UPPER-Q #11,648/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Fabbrica D'armi…
CPC-FOCUS F16C · 21 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.5 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -70% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Fabbrica D'armi Pietro Beretta S.P.A. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Federal-mogul’s 40.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.4 pts (28%) Velocity 3.3 pts (8%) Breadth 16.2 pts (40%) Claim depth 9.3 pts (23%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Atop S p A · near

40
Federal-Mogul… · this assignee

40
Fidia Farmaceutici… · near

40
Grace Engineering · near

40
J J Mackay Canada · near

40
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Federal-mogul's Innovation Score is 40.2/100 (top 36% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Federal-mogul?

Each dot is one of Federal-mogul’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Federal-mogul’s own 15.5 claims/patent is at or below the 16.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Federal-mogul vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Federal-mogul's grants concentrate

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 21 CPC subclasses with 96.2% of grants classified under F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Federal-mogul sits between Fabbrica D'armi Pietro Beretta S.P.A. and GEA Process Engineering A/S.

Federal-mogul's three-year grant acceleration

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Fabbrica D'armi P…

26
Facet

26
First American Fi…

26
Fosbel

26
Fender Musical In…

26
Flatiron Health

26
Frito-lay Trading

26
GEA Process Engin…

26
Federal-mogul Wie… ◀

26

What this shows Federal-Mogul holds 26 patents at rank #11,650, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Federal-Mogul

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,650 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in F16C (Shafts)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Federal-Mogul's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Federal-Mogul, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In F16C (Shafts), Federal-Mogul ranks #53 of 1,334 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (40 here).

J.J. Mackay Canada Limited 40 Grace Engineering Corp. 40 Atop S.p.A. 40 Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A. 40

Federal-mogul's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 36% higher than 64% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	6	23.1%
2016	6	23.1%
2017	1	3.8%
2018	4	15.4%
2019	3	11.5%
2020	2	7.7%
2021	1	3.8%
2022	1	3.8%
2023	2	7.7%

Which technologies does Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH patent most?

F16C - SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings 25

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 13

C22C - Alloys 9

Y02T - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Transportation 6

B32B - Layered Products, i.e. Products Built-up OF Strata OF Flat OR Non-flat, e.g. Cellular OR Honeycomb, Form 6

B22F - Working Metallic POWDER; Manufacture OF Articles From Metallic POWDER; Making Metallic Powder ; Apparatus OR Devices Specially Adapted FOR Metallic Powder 4

B23P - Metal-working NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Combined OPERATIONS; Universal Machine Tools 3

F16J - Pistons ; CYLINDERS; Sealings 3

C10M - Lubricating Compositions ; USE OF Chemical Substances Either Alone OR AS Lubricating Ingredients IN A Lubricating Composition 3

C09D - Coating Compositions, e.g. Paints, Varnishes OR LACQUERS; Filling PASTES; Chemical Paint OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; Correcting FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; Pastes OR Solids FOR Colouring OR PRINTING; USE OF Materials Therefor 3

C10N - Indexing Scheme Associated With Subclass C10m Relating TO Lubricating Compositions 3

B23B - TURNING; Boring 2

C22F - Changing THE Physical Structure OF Non-ferrous Metals AND Non-ferrous Alloys 2

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 2

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 2

Top 15 of 21 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH's lead technology class is F16C (SHAFTS; Flexible SHAFTS; Elements OR Crankshaft MECHANISMS; Rotary Bodies Other Than Gearing ELEMENTS; Bearings), 96.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16C
Ranked #11,648 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Federal-Mogul Wiesbaden GmbH against Fabbrica D'armi Pietro Beretta S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.