Feaam GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Feaam ranks #22,568 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 12 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #22,568
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 44th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.3/100)
- 14.1
- avg claims per patent
- -29%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R22568 · Foreign Corporation #22,568 · 12 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 12 grants
- MID-PACK #22,568/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Faber-castell
- CPC-NARROW H02K · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DOWN -29% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Faber-castell AG (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Feaam’s 33.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Feaam
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Feaam · this assignee 33
Feaam · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Feaam's Innovation Score is 33.3/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Feaam?
Each dot is one of Feaam’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Feaam’s own 14.1 claims/patent is at or below the 15.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Feaam's grants concentrate
Feaam GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Feaam sits between Faber-castell AG and Fiftythree, Inc..
Feaam's three-year grant acceleration
Feaam GmbH shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Feaam's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Faber-castell
Faber-castell AG
12 patents
- Faculty Physician…
Faculty Physicians AND Surgeons OF Loma Linda University School OF Medicine
12 patents
- Fadu
Fadu Inc.
12 patents
- Fatdoor
Fatdoor, Inc.
12 patents
- FGX International
FGX International Inc
12 patents
- Fibics Incorporat…
Fibics Incorporated
12 patents
- Fiery
Fiery, LLC
12 patents
- Fiftythree
Fiftythree, Inc.
12 patents
- Feaam ◀
Feaam GmbH
12 patents
What this shows Feaam holds 12 patents at rank #22,564, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Feaam
By rank, the assignees closest to #22,564 in granted patent volume.
- Faber-castell AG #22,560 · 12 patents
- Faculty Physicians AND Surgeons OF Loma Linda University School OF Medicine #22,561 · 12 patents
- Fadu Inc. #22,562 · 12 patents
- Fatdoor, Inc. #22,563 · 12 patents
- FGX International Inc #22,565 · 12 patents
- Fibics Incorporated #22,566 · 12 patents
- Fiery, LLC #22,567 · 12 patents
- Fiftythree, Inc. #22,568 · 12 patents
Leaders in H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Feaam's primary technology class.
Feaam's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 8.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Feaam GmbH patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Feaam GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Feaam GmbH's lead technology class is H02K (Dynamo-electric Machines), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H02K
- Ranked #22,568 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Feaam GmbH against Faber-castell AG, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.