Overall rank by patents
#3,196
of 49,997 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 117 granted patents across 50 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Evonik ranks #3,196 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 117 patents across 50 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R3196 · Foreign Corporation #3,196 · 117 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: B. G. Negev Technologies AND Applications Ltd., AT Ben-gurion University (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Airbnb · near
51 score
Asahi Kasei Chemicals · near
51 score
Evonik Röhm · this assignee
51 score
Lifetime Products · near
51 score
O&M Halyard · near
51 score
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Evonik's Innovation Score is 50.8/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Between 2020–2024, Evonik Röhm GmbH received 2 grants versus 115 in 2015–2019 (-98% equal-window velocity, below median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2015 at 31 grants and bottomed in 2020 at 2. Lead class C07C accounts for 29.9% of the portfolio across 50 subclasses. Volume neighbours: B. G. Negev Technologies AND Applications Ltd., AT Ben-gurion University (#3,192) and Kansai Paint Co., Ltd. (#3,200).
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
B. G. Negev Technologies AND Applications Ltd., AT Ben-gurion University
117 patents
Daido Metal Company Ltd.
117 patents
DigiLens Inc.
117 patents
EM Microelectronic-Marin SA
117 patents
GSI Technology Inc.
117 patents
Infobridge PTE. Ltd.
117 patents
John Mezzalingua Associates, LLC
117 patents
Kansai Paint Co., Ltd.
117 patents
Evonik Röhm GmbH
117 patents
What this shows Evonik holds 117 patents at rank #3,196, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #3,196 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Evonik's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Evonik, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (15.4 here).
Evonik's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 31 | 26.5% |
| 2016 | 22 | 18.8% |
| 2017 | 26 | 22.2% |
| 2018 | 17 | 14.5% |
| 2019 | 19 | 16.2% |
| 2020 | 2 | 1.7% |
Top 15 of 50 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#3,196
of 49,997 tracked assignees
50.8 out of 100
What to do with this data
Evonik Röhm GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.