USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Evonik Röhm Gmbh

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 117 granted patents across 50 technology areas, active 2015–2020. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS).

Compiled byPlainPatent Editorial, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Team · May 15, 2026

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

117

Total patents granted

CPC technology areas

15.4

Avg claims per patent

-98%

5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Evonik holds 117 US patents across 50 technology areas, rank #3,196 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#3,196
of 50,000 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (50.8/100): 15.4
avg claims per patent: -98%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Evonik Röhm Gmbh has been granted 117 US utility patents between 2015 and 2020, placing Evonik Röhm Gmbh at rank #3,196 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 50 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS). As a Foreign Corporation, Evonik Röhm Gmbh is one of the broader-portfolio assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Evonik sits between B. G. Negev Technologies AND Applications Ltd., AT Ben-gurion University (117 patents, rank #3,192) and Kansai Paint Co., Ltd. (117 patents, rank #3,200) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 50.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 115 in the 2015–2019 window, a -98% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Evonik Röhm Gmbh's 15.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 50 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Evonik Röhm Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

B G Negev AND App…

117
Daido Metal

117
Digilens

117
EM Microelectroni…

117
GSI Technology

117
Infobridge PTE

117
John Mezzalingua…

117
Kansai Paint

117
Evonik Röhm ◀

117

What this shows Evonik holds 117 patents at rank #3,196, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Evonik

By rank, the assignees closest to #3,196 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C07C (Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Evonik's primary technology class.

Evonik's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 50,000 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Evonik Röhm Gmbh patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	31	26.5%
2016	22	18.8%
2017	26	22.2%
2018	17	14.5%
2019	19	16.2%
2020	2	1.7%

Which technologies does Evonik Röhm Gmbh patent most?

C07C - ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS 35

C08F - MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS 30

A61K - PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES 27

B29C - SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING 19

C08J - WORKING-UP; GENERAL PROCESSES OF COMPOUNDING; AFTER-TREATMENT NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C08B, C08C, C08F, C08G or C08H 18

C09D - COATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR 17

Y10T - TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION 15

A61P - SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS 14

B01J - CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS 13

B29K - INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASSES B29B, B29C OR B29D, RELATING TO MOULDING MATERIALS OR TO MATERIALS FOR ; MOULDS, ; REINFORCEMENTS, FILLERS OR PREFORMED PARTS, e.g. INSERTS 12

C08L - COMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS 11

Y02P - CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS 8

B32B - LAYERED PRODUCTS, i.e. PRODUCTS BUILT-UP OF STRATA OF FLAT OR NON-FLAT, e.g. CELLULAR OR HONEYCOMB, FORM 8

C08K - Use of inorganic or non-macromolecular organic substances as compounding ingredients 8

B29L - INDEXING SCHEME ASSOCIATED WITH SUBCLASS B29C, RELATING TO PARTICULAR ARTICLES 7

Top 15 of 50 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Moderate

Tech Breadth Multi-domain

Claim Depth Standard

Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#3,196

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

50.8 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Evonik Röhm Gmbh hold?

Evonik Röhm Gmbh holds 117 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2020, spanning 50 technology areas.

What is Evonik Röhm Gmbh's Innovation Score?

Evonik Röhm Gmbh has an Innovation Score of 50.8 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Evonik Röhm Gmbh focus on?

Evonik Röhm Gmbh's top technology area is C07C (ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS) with 35 patents. The company has filed patents in 50 CPC subclasses total.

Is Evonik Röhm Gmbh's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?

Evonik Röhm Gmbh's recent filing velocity is -98% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Evonik Röhm Gmbh's patents?

Evonik Röhm Gmbh's patents average 15.4 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.

How is the Evonik Röhm Gmbh patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Evonik's 117 grants land it in the top 12% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Evonik ranks #3,196 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
Most of this portfolio concentrates in C07C - see who else leads that technology area. C07C leaders
Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled byPlainPatent Editorial, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Team · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.