EP Minerals LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, EP ranks #28,693 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #28,693
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 37%
- by Innovation Score (39.8/100)
- 15.0
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28693 · US Corporation #28,693 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,693/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Enrichment Technology
- CPC-FOCUS B01J · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How EP’s 39.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around EP
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- EP Minerals · this assignee
EP Minerals · this assignee
40 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows EP's Innovation Score is 39.8/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for EP?
Each dot is one of EP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). EP’s own 15.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where EP's grants concentrate
EP Minerals LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, EP sits between Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. and Erwin Junker Grinding Technology A.S..
EP's three-year grant acceleration
EP Minerals LLC shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at EP's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Enrichment Techno…
Enrichment Technology Company Ltd.
9 patents
- Enshu
Enshu Limited
9 patents
- Enumerix
Enumerix, Inc.
9 patents
- EOS Holding
EOS Holding GMBH
9 patents
- Epygon
Epygon
9 patents
- Equator Global
Equator Global Limited
9 patents
- Ericsson
Ericsson GMBH
9 patents
- Erwin Junker Grin…
Erwin Junker Grinding Technology A.S.
9 patents
- EP Minerals ◀
EP Minerals LLC
9 patents
What this shows EP holds 9 patents at rank #28,648, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near EP
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,648 in granted patent volume.
- Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. #28,644 · 9 patents
- Enshu Limited #28,645 · 9 patents
- Enumerix, Inc. #28,646 · 9 patents
- EOS Holding GMBH #28,647 · 9 patents
- Epygon #28,649 · 9 patents
- Equator Global Limited #28,650 · 9 patents
- Ericsson GMBH #28,651 · 9 patents
- Erwin Junker Grinding Technology A.S. #28,652 · 9 patents
Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EP's primary technology class.
EP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does EP Minerals LLC patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
EP Minerals LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- EP Minerals LLC's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
- Ranked #28,693 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare EP Minerals LLC against Enrichment Technology Company Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.