USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

EP Minerals LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, EP ranks #28,693 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 11 technology areas.

#28,693
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 37%
by Innovation Score (39.8/100)
15.0
avg claims per patent
+100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R28693 · US Corporation #28,693 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
  • MID-PACK #28,693/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Enrichment Technology
  • CPC-FOCUS B01J · 11 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 39.8/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.0 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How EP’s 39.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around EP

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows EP's Innovation Score is 39.8/100 (top 37% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for EP?

Each dot is one of EP’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). EP’s own 15.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

EP vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 8.98.999.1 010203040 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. - 9, 18.56Enrichment Techno…Enshu Limited - 9, 5EnshuEnumerix, Inc. - 9, 19.22EnumerixEOS Holding GMBH - 9, 10.67EOS HoldingEpygon - 9, 19.11EpygonEquator Global Limited - 9, 29.22Equator GlobalEricsson GMBH - 9, 10.44EricssonErwin Junker Grinding Technology A.S. - 9, 14.89Erwin Junker Grin…EP Minerals LLC - 9, 15EP Minerals
EP vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where EP's grants concentrate

EP Minerals LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, EP sits between Enrichment Technology Company Ltd. and Erwin Junker Grinding Technology A.S..

EP's three-year grant acceleration

EP Minerals LLC shows 5 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at EP's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows EP holds 9 patents at rank #28,648, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near EP

By rank, the assignees closest to #28,648 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in EP's primary technology class.

EP's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

40 Top 37% higher than 63% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 201520192021202220232024 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
EP Minerals LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 11.1%
2019 2 22.2%
2021 1 11.1%
2022 2 22.2%
2023 2 22.2%
2024 1 11.1%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

EP Minerals LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • EP Minerals LLC's lead technology class is B01J (Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B01J
  • Ranked #28,693 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare EP Minerals LLC against Enrichment Technology Company Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 39.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.