EON Surgical Ltd
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, EON ranks #19,722 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #19,722
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 18th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.5/100)
- 16.7
- avg claims per patent
- -73%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R19722 · Foreign Corporation #19,722 · 14 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
- MID-PACK #19,722/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Engineering Services
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 3 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -73% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Engineering Services Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How EON’s 25.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around EON
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- EON Surgical · this assignee 26
EON Surgical · this assignee
26 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows EON's Innovation Score is 25.5/100 (18th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for EON?
Each dot is one of EON’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). EON’s own 16.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where EON's grants concentrate
EON Surgical Ltd is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, EON sits between Engineering Services Inc. and Erbe-usa, Inc..
Who files at EON's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Engineering Servi…
Engineering Services Inc.
14 patents
- Enorcom
Enorcom Corporation
14 patents
- Entersekt Interna…
Entersekt International Limited
14 patents
- EO Technics
EO Technics Co., Ltd
14 patents
- EOS Energy Storage
EOS Energy Storage LLC
14 patents
- EPC Product
EPC Product LLC
14 patents
- Eqpme
Eqpme Inc.
14 patents
- Erbe-usa
Erbe-usa, Inc.
14 patents
- EON Surgical ◀
EON Surgical Ltd
14 patents
What this shows EON holds 14 patents at rank #19,711, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near EON
By rank, the assignees closest to #19,711 in granted patent volume.
- Engineering Services Inc. #19,707 · 14 patents
- Enorcom Corporation #19,708 · 14 patents
- Entersekt International Limited #19,709 · 14 patents
- EO Technics Co., Ltd #19,710 · 14 patents
- EOS Energy Storage LLC #19,712 · 14 patents
- EPC Product LLC #19,713 · 14 patents
- Eqpme Inc. #19,714 · 14 patents
- Erbe-usa, Inc. #19,715 · 14 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in EON's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
EON's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 18th percentile higher than 18% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 7.1% |
| 2017 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 4 | 28.6% |
| 2019 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 7.1% |
Which technologies does EON Surgical Ltd patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
EON Surgical Ltd's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- EON Surgical Ltd's lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #19,722 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare EON Surgical Ltd against Engineering Services Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.