Emefcy Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Emefcy ranks #35,173 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #35,173
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 32nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (29.8/100)
- 20.0
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35173 · Foreign Corporation #35,173 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,173/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ellis Patents…
- CPC-NARROW C02F · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 29.8/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ellis Patents (HOLDINGS) Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Emefcy’s 29.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Emefcy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Emefcy · this assignee 30
Emefcy · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Emefcy's Innovation Score is 29.8/100 (32nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Emefcy?
Each dot is one of Emefcy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Emefcy’s own 20.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Emefcy's grants concentrate
Emefcy Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Emefcy sits between Ellis Patents (HOLDINGS) Limited and Emonster Inc.
Who files at Emefcy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ellis Patents (Ho…
Ellis Patents (HOLDINGS) Limited
7 patents
- Eloxx Pharmaceuti…
Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
7 patents
- Elyse Enterprises
Elyse Enterprises LLC
7 patents
- Embr Labs IP
Embr Labs IP LLC
7 patents
- Emfit OY
Emfit OY
7 patents
- Emisense
Emisense Technologies, LLC
7 patents
- Emmeci S P A
Emmeci S.P.A.
7 patents
- Emonster
Emonster Inc
7 patents
- Emefcy ◀
Emefcy Ltd.
7 patents
What this shows Emefcy holds 7 patents at rank #35,134, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Emefcy
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,134 in granted patent volume.
- Ellis Patents (HOLDINGS) Limited #35,130 · 7 patents
- Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Ltd. #35,131 · 7 patents
- Elyse Enterprises LLC #35,132 · 7 patents
- Embr Labs IP LLC #35,133 · 7 patents
- Emfit OY #35,135 · 7 patents
- Emisense Technologies, LLC #35,136 · 7 patents
- Emmeci S.P.A. #35,137 · 7 patents
- Emonster Inc #35,138 · 7 patents
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Emefcy's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Emefcy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 32nd percentile higher than 32% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2016 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2020 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Emefcy Ltd. patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Emefcy Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Emefcy Ltd.'s lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #35,173 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Emefcy Ltd. against Ellis Patents (HOLDINGS) Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 29.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.