USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Elegant Headwear Co., Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A42B (HATS; Head Coverings).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Elegant ranks #46,444 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 10 technology areas.

#46,444
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
8th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.4/100)
6.8
avg claims per patent
-75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46444 · US Corporation #46,444 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #46,444/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Electro Power…
  • CPC-FOCUS A42B · 10 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.4/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.8 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -75% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Electro Power Systems S.P.A. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Elegant’s 21.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Elegant

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Elegant's Innovation Score is 21.4/100 (8th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Elegant?

Each dot is one of Elegant’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Elegant’s own 6.8 claims/patent is at or below the 10.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Elegant vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Electro Power Systems S.P.A. - 5, 5Electro Power Sys…Electrolab, Inc. - 5, 7ElectrolabElectronic Transaction Consultants, LLC - 5, 19.6Transaction Consu…Eleda S.R.L. - 5, 13.8Eleda S R LElite Optoelectronics Co., Ltd - 5, 10.4Elite Optoelectro…Elkem AS - 5, 8Elkem ASEllwood National Investment Corp. - 5, 11.8Ellwood National…Elmac Technologies Limited - 5, 17.4ElmacElegant Headwear Co., Inc. - 5, 6.8Elegant Headwear
Elegant vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Elegant's grants concentrate

Elegant Headwear Co., Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under A42B (HATS; Head Coverings). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Elegant sits between Electro Power Systems S.P.A. and Elmac Technologies Limited.

Who files at Elegant's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Elegant holds 5 patents at rank #46,406, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Elegant

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,406 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A42B (HATS)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Elegant's primary technology class.

Elegant's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

21 8th percentile higher than 8% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0.511.522.5 201820192021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Elegant Headwear Co., Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 2 40.0%
2019 2 40.0%
2021 1 20.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Elegant Headwear Co., Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Elegant Headwear Co., Inc.'s lead technology class is A42B (HATS; Head Coverings), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A42B
  • Ranked #46,444 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Elegant Headwear Co., Inc. against Electro Power Systems S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.