Overall rank by patents
#28,681
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 8 technology areas, active 2025–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F25D (REFRIGERATORS; COLD ROOMS; ICE-BOXES; COOLING OR FREEZING APPARATUS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR).
The verdict
Electrolux holds 9 US patents across 8 technology areas, rank #28,681 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. has been granted 9 US utility patents between 2025 and 2025, placing Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. at rank #28,681 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 8 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 12.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in F25D (REFRIGERATORS; COLD ROOMS; ICE-BOXES; COOLING OR FREEZING APPARATUS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR). As a US Corporation, Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Electrolux sits between Eidetic Communications Inc. (9 patents, rank #28,677) and Elijah Tooling, Inc. (9 patents, rank #28,685) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2025 through 2025, with 9 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.'s 12.9 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 8 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Eidetic Communications Inc.
9 patents
Einride AB
9 patents
ElectroPhotonic-IC Inc.
9 patents
ElectroSea, LLC
9 patents
Elekta Instrument AB
9 patents
Elektrofi, Inc.
9 patents
Eliaz Therapeutics, Inc.
9 patents
Elijah Tooling, Inc.
9 patents
Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Electrolux holds 9 patents at rank #28,681, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #28,681 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Electrolux's primary technology class.
Electrolux's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 82% higher than 18% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2025–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 9 | 100.0% |
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#28,681
Across all tracked assignees
25.7 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Electrolux's 9 grants land it in the top 82% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.