USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

eHarmony, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 16 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, eharmony ranks #17,632 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 16 patents across 6 technology areas.

#17,632
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
14th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.1/100)
9.5
avg claims per patent
-93%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R17632 · US Corporation #17,632 · 16 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 16 grants
  • MID-PACK #17,632/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH aeris
  • CPC-NARROW G06F · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.1/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 9.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -93% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: aeris GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How eharmony’s 24.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around eharmony

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows eharmony's Innovation Score is 24.1/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for eharmony?

Each dot is one of eharmony’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). eharmony’s own 9.5 claims/patent is at or below the 13.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

eharmony vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 14.51515.51616.5 0102030 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Zhejiang Zhengte Co., Ltd. - 16, 1.31Zhejiang ZhengteZimmer Surgical, Inc. - 16, 13.12Zimmer SurgicalZum Services, Inc. - 16, 18.94Zum Servicesaeris GmbH - 16, 11.44aerisiStreamPlanet Co., LLC - 16, 18.94istreamplanetinodyn NewMedia GmbH - 16, 12.5inodyn Newmedia138 East LCD Advancements Limited - 15, 27.2138 East LCD Adva…360 IT, UAB - 15, 19.53360 IT UABeHarmony, Inc. - 16, 9.5eharmony
eharmony vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where eharmony's grants concentrate

eHarmony, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 75% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, eharmony sits between Zhejiang Zhengte Co., Ltd. and 360 IT, UAB.

Who files at eHarmony's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows eHarmony holds 16 patents at rank #18,328, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near eHarmony

By rank, the assignees closest to #18,328 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in eHarmony's primary technology class.

eharmony's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 201520162017201820192020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
eHarmony, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 25.0%
2016 2 12.5%
2017 3 18.8%
2018 2 12.5%
2019 4 25.0%
2020 1 6.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

eHarmony, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • eHarmony, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 75% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
  • Ranked #17,632 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare eHarmony, Inc. against Zhejiang Zhengte Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.