Effekt, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2017. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Effekt ranks #46,405 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 9 technology areas.
- #46,405
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 17th percentile
- by Innovation Score (25.2/100)
- 14.0
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46405 · US Corporation #46,405 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,405/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Edgecortix PTE
- CPC-NARROW B63B · 9 areas
- INNOV-THIN 25.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Edgecortix PTE. Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Effekt’s 25.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Effekt
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Effekt · this assignee 25
Effekt · this assignee
25 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Effekt's Innovation Score is 25.2/100 (17th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Effekt?
Each dot is one of Effekt’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Effekt’s own 14.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Effekt's grants concentrate
Effekt, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 40% of grants classified under B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping). By volume, Effekt sits between Edgecortix PTE. Ltd. and Egis Gyogyszergyar ZRT..
Who files at Effekt's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Edgecortix PTE
Edgecortix PTE. Ltd.
5 patents
- Eduard Wille & KT
Eduard Wille GMBH & Co. KT
5 patents
- Edward VIA Virgin…
Edward VIA Virginia College OF Osteopathic Medicine
5 patents
- EDX Education
EDX Education Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Efore OYJ
Efore OYJ
5 patents
- Egg-chick Automat…
Egg-chick Automated Technologies
5 patents
- Eggciting Product…
Eggciting Products B.V.
5 patents
- Egis Gyogyszergya…
Egis Gyogyszergyar ZRT.
5 patents
- Effekt ◀
Effekt, LLC
5 patents
What this shows Effekt holds 5 patents at rank #46,384, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Effekt
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,384 in granted patent volume.
- Edgecortix PTE. Ltd. #46,380 · 5 patents
- Eduard Wille GMBH & Co. KT #46,381 · 5 patents
- Edward VIA Virginia College OF Osteopathic Medicine #46,382 · 5 patents
- EDX Education Co., Ltd. #46,383 · 5 patents
- Efore OYJ #46,385 · 5 patents
- Egg-chick Automated Technologies #46,386 · 5 patents
- Eggciting Products B.V. #46,387 · 5 patents
- Egis Gyogyszergyar ZRT. #46,388 · 5 patents
Leaders in B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne Vessels)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Effekt's primary technology class.
- Brunswick Corporation 196 in class
- United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force 141 in class
- Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha 140 in class
- Itrec B.V. 83 in class
- MasterCraft Boat Company, LLC 63 in class
- Furuno Electric Company Limited 51 in class
- PGS Geophysical AS 49 in class
- Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. 49 in class
Effekt's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
25 17th percentile higher than 17% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 5 | 100.0% |
Which technologies does Effekt, LLC patent most?
Top 9 of 9 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Effekt, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Effekt, LLC's lead technology class is B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping), 40% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B63B
- Ranked #46,405 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Effekt, LLC against Edgecortix PTE. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 25.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.