eBuddy Technologies B.V.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04M (Telephonic Communication).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, ebuddy ranks #28,628 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #28,628
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 27th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.3/100)
- 18.3
- avg claims per patent
- +200%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R28628 · Foreign Corporation #28,628 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #28,628/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH d-MATRIX
- CPC-NARROW H04M · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +200% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: d-MATRIX Corporation (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How ebuddy’s 28.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around ebuddy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- eBuddy B V · this assignee 28
eBuddy B V · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows ebuddy's Innovation Score is 28.3/100 (27th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for ebuddy?
Each dot is one of ebuddy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). ebuddy’s own 18.3 claims/patent is at or below the 18.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where ebuddy's grants concentrate
eBuddy Technologies B.V. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H04M (Telephonic Communication). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2023. By volume, ebuddy sits between d-MATRIX Corporation and en-Gauge, Inc..
ebuddy's three-year grant acceleration
eBuddy Technologies B.V. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at eBuddy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- d-matrix
d-MATRIX Corporation
9 patents
- de Werth Group
de Werth Group AG
9 patents
- dewaal IP
deWaal IP LLC
9 patents
- e-vision
e-Vision, LLC
9 patents
- efolder
eFolder Inc.
9 patents
- egain
eGain Corporation
9 patents
- eazy-pz
eazy-PZ, LLC
9 patents
- en-gauge
en-Gauge, Inc.
9 patents
- ebuddy B V ◀
eBuddy Technologies B.V.
9 patents
What this shows eBuddy holds 9 patents at rank #30,671, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near eBuddy
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,671 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H04M (Telephonic Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in eBuddy's primary technology class.
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4,133 in class
- Apple Inc. 2,103 in class
- LG Electronics Inc. 1,342 in class
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. 1,077 in class
- International Business Machines Corporation 999 in class
- Google LLC 969 in class
- AT&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. 952 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 904 in class
ebuddy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 27th percentile higher than 27% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2020 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2021 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does eBuddy Technologies B.V. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
eBuddy Technologies B.V.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- eBuddy Technologies B.V.'s lead technology class is H04M (Telephonic Communication), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04M
- Ranked #28,628 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare eBuddy Technologies B.V. against d-MATRIX Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.