Where does Easy Mining Sweden AB rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Easy Mining Sweden AB ranks #46,362 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Easy Mining Sweden AB hold?

Easy Mining Sweden AB holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 13 technology areas.

What is Easy Mining Sweden AB's Innovation Score?

Easy Mining Sweden AB has an Innovation Score of 29.0 out of 100 (29th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Easy Mining Sweden AB focus on?

Easy Mining Sweden AB's top technology area is C05B (Phosphatic Fertilisers) with 4 patents, ranking #14 of 73 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 13 CPC subclasses total.

Is Easy Mining Sweden AB's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Easy Mining Sweden AB's recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Easy Mining Sweden AB's patents?

Easy Mining Sweden AB's patents average 16.8 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Easy Mining Sweden AB patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Easy Mining Sweden AB

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 13 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C05B (Phosphatic Fertilisers).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Easy ranks #46,362 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 13 technology areas.

#46,362
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 29th percentile
by Innovation Score (29.0/100): 16.8
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R46362 · Foreign Corporation #46,362 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #46,362/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Eagleyemed
CPC-FOCUS C05B · 13 areas
INNOV-THIN 29.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.8 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Eagleyemed Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Easy’s 29.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (21%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 12.7 pts (44%) Claim depth 10.1 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Easy Mining Sweden AB · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Easy's Innovation Score is 29.0/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Easy?

Each dot is one of Easy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Easy’s own 16.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 12.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Easy vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Easy's grants concentrate

Easy Mining Sweden AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 13 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under C05B (Phosphatic Fertilisers). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Easy sits between Eagleyemed Inc. and Ebb Carbon, Inc..

Eagleyemed

5
Earthsense

5
East Mountain Out…

5
East West Manufac…

5
Easy Slice

5
Easycare

5
Eaton Electrical

5
Ebb Carbon

5
Easy Mining Swede… ◀

5

What this shows Easy holds 5 patents at rank #46,509, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Easy

By rank, the assignees closest to #46,509 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C05B (Phosphatic Fertilisers)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Easy's primary technology class.

Easy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Easy Mining Sweden AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	1	20.0%
2018	1	20.0%
2020	2	40.0%
2025partial year	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Easy Mining Sweden AB patent most?

C05B - Phosphatic Fertilisers 4

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 4

C01F - Compounds OF THE Metals Beryllium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Calcium, Strontium, Barium, Radium, Thorium, OR OF THE Rare-earth Metals 3

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 3

C05F - Organic Fertilisers NOT Covered BY Subclasses C05b, C05c, e.g. Fertilisers From Waste OR Refuse 2

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 2

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 2

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 2

C05C - Nitrogenous Fertilisers 1

C05D - Inorganic Fertilisers NOT Covered BY Subclasses C05b, C05C; Fertilisers Producing Carbon Dioxide 1

C01D - Compounds OF Alkali Metals, i.e. Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, Caesium, OR Francium 1

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 1

B01D - Separation 1

Top 13 of 13 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Easy Mining Sweden AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Easy Mining Sweden AB's lead technology class is C05B (Phosphatic Fertilisers), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C05B
Ranked #46,362 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Easy Mining Sweden AB against Eagleyemed Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 29.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.