Eagle US 2 LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Eagle ranks #26,176 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #26,176
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 39th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
- 19.5
- avg claims per patent
- -75%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R26176 · US Corporation #26,176 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #26,176/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ear Labs AB
- CPC-FOCUS C02F · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.5 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -75% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ear Labs AB (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Eagle’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Eagle
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Eagle US 2 · this assignee 32
Eagle US 2 · this assignee
32 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Eagle's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Eagle?
Each dot is one of Eagle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Eagle’s own 19.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Eagle's grants concentrate
Eagle US 2 LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Eagle sits between EYE Labs, LLC and Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum.
Who files at Eagle's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- EYE Labs
EYE Labs, LLC
10 patents
- Eyecam
Eyecam, Inc.
10 patents
- Eyeway Vision
Eyeway Vision Ltd.
10 patents
- EZ Lynk Sezc
EZ Lynk Sezc
10 patents
- Ear Labs AB
Ear Labs AB
10 patents
- Earthstone Intern…
Earthstone International LLC
10 patents
- Easepal Enterpris…
Easepal Enterprises Limited
10 patents
- Eberhard-karls-un…
Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum
10 patents
- Eagle US 2 ◀
Eagle US 2 LLC
10 patents
What this shows Eagle holds 10 patents at rank #26,226, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Eagle
By rank, the assignees closest to #26,226 in granted patent volume.
- EYE Labs, LLC #26,222 · 10 patents
- Eyecam, Inc. #26,223 · 10 patents
- Eyeway Vision Ltd. #26,224 · 10 patents
- EZ Lynk Sezc #26,225 · 10 patents
- Ear Labs AB #26,227 · 10 patents
- Earthstone International LLC #26,228 · 10 patents
- Easepal Enterprises Limited #26,229 · 10 patents
- Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum #26,230 · 10 patents
Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eagle's primary technology class.
- Ecolab USA Inc. 243 in class
- King Fahd University OF Petroleum AND Minerals 188 in class
- Evoqua Water Technologies LLC 177 in class
- Saudi Arabian OIL Company 147 in class
- Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies Support 82 in class
- Kurita Water Industries Ltd. 80 in class
- Nanjing University 75 in class
- Kemira OYJ 55 in class
Eagle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 5 | 50.0% |
| 2019 | 3 | 30.0% |
| 2021 | 2 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Eagle US 2 LLC patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Eagle US 2 LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Eagle US 2 LLC's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
- Ranked #26,176 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Eagle US 2 LLC against EYE Labs, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.