USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Eagle US 2 LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Eagle ranks #26,176 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 11 technology areas.

#26,176
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
39th percentile
by Innovation Score (31.7/100)
19.5
avg claims per patent
-75%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R26176 · US Corporation #26,176 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
  • MID-PACK #26,176/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Ear Labs AB
  • CPC-FOCUS C02F · 11 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 31.7/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 19.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -75% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Ear Labs AB (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Eagle’s 31.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Eagle

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Eagle's Innovation Score is 31.7/100 (39th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Eagle?

Each dot is one of Eagle’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Eagle’s own 19.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Eagle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 9.99.91010.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent EYE Labs, LLC - 10, 21.2EYE LabsEyecam, Inc. - 10, 22.7EyecamEyeway Vision Ltd. - 10, 20Eyeway VisionEZ Lynk Sezc - 10, 16EZ Lynk SezcEar Labs AB - 10, 2.5Ear Labs ABEarthstone International LLC - 10, 11.1Earthstone Intern…Easepal Enterprises Limited - 10, 1.9Easepal Enterpris…Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum - 10, 13.4Eberhard-karls-un…Eagle US 2 LLC - 10, 19.5Eagle US 2
Eagle vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Eagle's grants concentrate

Eagle US 2 LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2021. By volume, Eagle sits between EYE Labs, LLC and Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Universitätsklinikum.

Who files at Eagle's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Eagle holds 10 patents at rank #26,226, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Eagle

By rank, the assignees closest to #26,226 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Eagle's primary technology class.

Eagle's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 39th percentile higher than 39% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

123456 201820192021 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Eagle US 2 LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2018 5 50.0%
2019 3 30.0%
2021 2 20.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Eagle US 2 LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Eagle US 2 LLC's lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
  • Ranked #26,176 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Eagle US 2 LLC against EYE Labs, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 31.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.