USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

E-z-dock, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, E-z-dock ranks #35,095 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 4 technology areas.

#35,095
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
16th percentile
by Innovation Score (24.9/100)
17.7
avg claims per patent
-83%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R35095 · US Corporation #35,095 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
  • MID-PACK #35,095/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Dynex
  • CPC-NARROW B63B · 4 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 24.9/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 17.7 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DROP -83% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Dynex Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How E-z-dock’s 24.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around E-z-dock

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows E-z-dock's Innovation Score is 24.9/100 (16th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for E-z-dock?

Each dot is one of E-z-dock’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). E-z-dock’s own 17.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

E-z-dock vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 6.97.07.077.07.07.1 05101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Dynex Technologies, Inc. - 7, 17.86DynexDynomax Drilling Tools Inc. - 7, 13.86Dynomax Drilling…E-link Technology Co., Ltd - 7, 2.14E-link TechnologyE-peas S.A. - 7, 15.86E-peasE. Dillon & Company - 7, 14E Dillon &E.S.I. Software Ltd. - 7, 18E S I SoftwareE3D Agricultural Cooperative Association Ltd. - 7, 15.29E3D Agricultural…Earth Energies, Inc. - 7, 14.43Earth EnergiesE-z-dock, Inc. - 7, 17.71E-z-dock
E-z-dock vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where E-z-dock's grants concentrate

E-z-dock, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, E-z-dock sits between Dynex Technologies, Inc. and Earth Energies, Inc..

Who files at E-z-dock's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows E-z-dock holds 7 patents at rank #35,089, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near E-z-dock

By rank, the assignees closest to #35,089 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in E-z-dock's primary technology class.

E-z-dock's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

25 16th percentile higher than 16% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2015201720192020 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
E-z-dock, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 4 57.1%
2017 1 14.3%
2019 1 14.3%
2020 1 14.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

E-z-dock, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • E-z-dock, Inc.'s lead technology class is B63B (Ships OR Other Waterborne VESSELS; Equipment FOR Shipping), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B63B
  • Ranked #35,095 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare E-z-dock, Inc. against Dynex Technologies, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 24.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.