Dynaspot Corp.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03H (Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Dynaspot ranks #46,339 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.
- #46,339
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 33rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.1/100)
- 17.0
- avg claims per patent
- +50%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R46339 · US Corporation #46,339 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #46,339/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Dado Lighting
- CPC-NARROW H03H · 4 areas
- INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +50% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Dado Lighting, LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Dynaspot’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Dynaspot
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Dynaspot · this assignee 30
Dynaspot · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Dynaspot's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Dynaspot?
Each dot is one of Dynaspot’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Dynaspot’s own 17.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Dynaspot's grants concentrate
Dynaspot Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under H03H (Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators). By volume, Dynaspot sits between DYM Solution Co., Ltd. and Daedalus Blue LLC.
Dynaspot's three-year grant acceleration
Dynaspot Corp. shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Dynaspot's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- DYM Solution
DYM Solution Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Dynamic Biosensors
Dynamic Biosensors GMBH
5 patents
- Dynamic Invention
Dynamic Invention LLC
5 patents
- Dynamic Solar Sys…
Dynamic Solar Systems AG
5 patents
- Dynatech Systems
Dynatech Systems, Inc.
5 patents
- Dynatron
Dynatron Corporation
5 patents
- Dado Lighting
Dado Lighting, LLC
5 patents
- Daedalus Blue
Daedalus Blue LLC
5 patents
- Dynaspot ◀
Dynaspot Corp.
5 patents
What this shows Dynaspot holds 5 patents at rank #46,198, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Dynaspot
By rank, the assignees closest to #46,198 in granted patent volume.
- DYM Solution Co., Ltd. #46,194 · 5 patents
- Dynamic Biosensors GMBH #46,195 · 5 patents
- Dynamic Invention LLC #46,196 · 5 patents
- Dynamic Solar Systems AG #46,197 · 5 patents
- Dynatech Systems, Inc. #46,199 · 5 patents
- Dynatron Corporation #46,200 · 5 patents
- Dado Lighting, LLC #46,201 · 5 patents
- Daedalus Blue LLC #46,202 · 5 patents
Leaders in H03H (Impedance Networks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Dynaspot's primary technology class.
Dynaspot's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 20.0% |
Which technologies does Dynaspot Corp. patent most?
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Dynaspot Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Dynaspot Corp.'s lead technology class is H03H (Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03H
- Ranked #46,339 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Dynaspot Corp. against DYM Solution Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.