USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 12 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2016. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61G (TRANSPORT, PERSONAL CONVEYANCES, OR ACCOMMODATION SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR PATIENTS OR DISABLED PERSONS ; OPERATING TABLES OR CHAIRS; CHAIRS FOR DENTISTRY; FUNERAL DEVICES).

12
Total patents granted
4
CPC technology areas
6.3
Avg claims per patent
-100%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Drive holds 12 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #22,485 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#22,485
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 94%
by Innovation Score (19.7/100)
6.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing has been granted 12 US utility patents between 2015 and 2016, placing Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing at rank #22,485 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 6.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61G (TRANSPORT, PERSONAL CONVEYANCES, OR ACCOMMODATION SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR PATIENTS OR DISABLED PERSONS ; OPERATING TABLES OR CHAIRS; CHAIRS FOR DENTISTRY; FUNERAL DEVICES). As a US Corporation, Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. The composite Innovation Score of 19.7/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 12 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's 6.3 average claims per patent suggests focused, narrowly drawn claims typical of single-invention filings, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

How does Drive compare?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus the largest corporate holders, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Drive holds 12 patents, placing it at rank #22,485 overall, well behind the volume leaders but ahead of the tens of thousands of smaller assignees in the dataset.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Drive's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

20 Top 94% higher than 6% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Above this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

4.555.566.577.5 20152016 7
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2016

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 5 41.7%
2016 7 58.3%

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Specialized
Claim Depth Simple
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#22,485

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

19.7 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing hold?
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing holds 12 US granted patents filed between 2015 and 2016, spanning 4 technology areas.
What is Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's Innovation Score?
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing has an Innovation Score of 19.7 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing focus on?
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's top technology area is A61G (TRANSPORT, PERSONAL CONVEYANCES, OR ACCOMMODATION SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR PATIENTS OR DISABLED PERSONS ; OPERATING TABLES OR CHAIRS; CHAIRS FOR DENTISTRY; FUNERAL DEVICES) with 5 patents. The company has filed patents in 4 CPC subclasses total.
Is Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's recent filing velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's patents?
Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing's patents average 6.3 claims each. This is relatively simple claim structure, typical for focused inventions.
How is the Drive Medical Design & Manufacturing patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

Guides to patent portfolio analysis

How to use this portfolio

Drive's 12 grants land it in the top 94% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Drive ranks #22,485 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61G - see who else leads that technology area. A61G leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Explore the patent dataset

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.