Overall rank by patents
#24,221
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 12 technology areas, active 2015–2021. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: B06B (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, ; e.g.; FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL).
The verdict
Dr. holds 11 US patents across 12 technology areas, rank #24,221 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Dr. Hielscher Gmbh has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2021, placing Dr. Hielscher Gmbh at rank #24,221 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 12 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in B06B (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR GENERATING OR TRANSMITTING MECHANICAL VIBRATIONS OF INFRASONIC, SONIC, OR ULTRASONIC FREQUENCY, ; e.g.; FOR PERFORMING MECHANICAL WORK IN GENERAL). As a Foreign Corporation, Dr. Hielscher Gmbh is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Dr. sits between Dolphin N2 Limited (11 patents, rank #24,217) and Dutton-lainson Company (11 patents, rank #24,225) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 28.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 2 grants, compared with 9 in the 2015–2019 window, a -78% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Dr. Hielscher Gmbh's 13.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 12 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Dr. Hielscher Gmbh against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Dolphin N2 Limited
11 patents
Domaille Engineering, LLC
11 patents
Dongguan Mimao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
11 patents
DoubleMe, Inc.
11 patents
Drift.com, Inc.
11 patents
DrinkSavvy, Inc.
11 patents
DroneUp, LLC
11 patents
Dutton-Lainson Company
11 patents
Dr. Hielscher GmbH
11 patents
What this shows Dr. holds 11 patents at rank #24,221, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Dr.'s Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 Top 71% higher than 29% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 2 | 18.2% |
| 2017 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2019 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2021 | 2 | 18.2% |
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#24,221
Across all tracked assignees
28.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Dr.'s 11 grants land it in the top 71% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.