Digger Specialties, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Digger ranks #31,403 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #31,403
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 41st percentile
- by Innovation Score (32.5/100)
- 16.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R31403 · US Corporation #31,403 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #31,403/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Dextera Surgical
- CPC-NARROW E04F · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 32.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Dextera Surgical (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Digger’s 32.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Digger
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Digger Specialties · this assignee 33
Digger Specialties · this assignee
33 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Digger's Innovation Score is 32.5/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Digger?
Each dot is one of Digger’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Digger’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Digger's grants concentrate
Digger Specialties, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Digger sits between Dextera Surgical and Dip-Tech, Ltd..
Digger's three-year grant acceleration
Digger Specialties, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Digger's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Dextera Surgical
Dextera Surgical
8 patents
- Diagnostic Biosys…
Diagnostic BioSystems
8 patents
- Diagnostics for t…
Diagnostics for the Real World, Ltd.
8 patents
- Diem
Diem GmbH
8 patents
- Digital Aerolus
Digital Aerolus, Inc.
8 patents
- Digitaloptometrics
DigitalOptometrics LLC
8 patents
- Dimex Office Prod…
Dimex Office Products LLC
8 patents
- Dip-tech
Dip-Tech, Ltd.
8 patents
- Digger Specialties ◀
Digger Specialties, Inc.
8 patents
What this shows Digger holds 8 patents at rank #31,447, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Digger
By rank, the assignees closest to #31,447 in granted patent volume.
- Dextera Surgical #31,443 · 8 patents
- Diagnostic BioSystems #31,444 · 8 patents
- Diagnostics for the Real World, Ltd. #31,445 · 8 patents
- Diem GmbH #31,446 · 8 patents
- Digital Aerolus, Inc. #31,448 · 8 patents
- DigitalOptometrics LLC #31,449 · 8 patents
- Dimex Office Products LLC #31,450 · 8 patents
- Dip-Tech, Ltd. #31,451 · 8 patents
Leaders in E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Digger's primary technology class.
Digger's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
33 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2018 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2019 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2024 | 1 | 12.5% |
Which technologies does Digger Specialties, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Digger Specialties, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Digger Specialties, Inc.'s lead technology class is E04F (Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E04F
- Ranked #31,403 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Digger Specialties, Inc. against Dextera Surgical, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 32.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.