Diamond Products Limited
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B28D (Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Diamond ranks #35,013 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #35,013
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 45th percentile
- by Innovation Score (33.7/100)
- 18.7
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R35013 · US Corporation #35,013 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #35,013/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Diageo Brands B V
- CPC-NARROW B28D · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 33.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Diageo Brands B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Diamond’s 33.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Diamond
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Diamond Products · this assignee 34
Diamond Products · this assignee
34 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Diamond's Innovation Score is 33.7/100 (45th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Diamond?
Each dot is one of Diamond’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Diamond’s own 18.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Diamond's grants concentrate
Diamond Products Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under B28D (Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Diamond sits between Diageo Brands B.V. and Digital Surgery Systems, Inc..
Diamond's three-year grant acceleration
Diamond Products Limited shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Diamond's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Diageo Brands B V
Diageo Brands B.V.
7 patents
- Diagnosys
Diagnosys LLC
7 patents
- Diakopto
Diakopto, Inc.
7 patents
- Dialware
Dialware Inc
7 patents
- Didimo
Didimo, Inc.
7 patents
- Diehl Metall Stif…
Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. KG
7 patents
- Digirettes
Digirettes, Inc.
7 patents
- Digital Surgery S…
Digital Surgery Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Diamond Products ◀
Diamond Products Limited
7 patents
What this shows Diamond holds 7 patents at rank #35,049, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Diamond
By rank, the assignees closest to #35,049 in granted patent volume.
- Diageo Brands B.V. #35,045 · 7 patents
- Diagnosys LLC #35,046 · 7 patents
- Diakopto, Inc. #35,047 · 7 patents
- Dialware Inc #35,048 · 7 patents
- Didimo, Inc. #35,050 · 7 patents
- Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. KG #35,051 · 7 patents
- Digirettes, Inc. #35,052 · 7 patents
- Digital Surgery Systems, Inc. #35,053 · 7 patents
Leaders in B28D (Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Diamond's primary technology class.
Diamond's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
34 45th percentile higher than 45% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Diamond Products Limited patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Diamond Products Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Diamond Products Limited's lead technology class is B28D (Working Stone OR Stone-like Materials), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B28D
- Ranked #35,013 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Diamond Products Limited against Diageo Brands B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 33.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.