Where does Design Ideas, Ltd. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Design Ideas, Ltd. ranks #11,229 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Design Ideas, Ltd. hold?

Design Ideas, Ltd. holds 27 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Design Ideas, Ltd.'s Innovation Score?

Design Ideas, Ltd. has an Innovation Score of 21.9 out of 100 (9th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Design Ideas, Ltd.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Design Ideas, Ltd.'s recent grant velocity is -8% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Design Ideas, Ltd.'s patents?

Design Ideas, Ltd.'s patents average 2.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Design Ideas, Ltd. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Design Ideas, Ltd.

Q: What technology areas does Design Ideas, Ltd. focus on?

Design Ideas, Ltd.'s top technology area is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages) with 3 patents, ranking #1,165 of 3,365 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 27 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Design ranks #11,229 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 27 patents across 3 technology areas.

#11,229
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.9/100): 2.7
avg claims per patent: -8%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R11229 · US Corporation #11,229 · 27 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 27 grants
UPPER-Q #11,229/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Denso
CPC-NARROW B65D · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 21.9/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT -8% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Denso Electronics Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Design’s 21.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.5 pts (53%) Velocity 2.7 pts (12%) Breadth 6.1 pts (28%) Claim depth 1.6 pts (7%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Lasko Operations… · near

22
K&H Manufacturing · near

22
Design Ideas · this assignee

22
Anji Weiyu Furniture · near

22
Bestter (Xiamen)… · near

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Design's Innovation Score is 21.9/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Design?

Each dot is one of Design’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Design’s own 2.7 claims/patent is at or below the 15.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Design vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Design's grants concentrate

Design Ideas, Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 11.1% of grants classified under B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Design sits between Denso Electronics Corporation and DynaEnergetics GmbH & Co. KG.

Design's three-year grant acceleration

Design Ideas, Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 10 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Denso

27
Dimaag-ai

27
DL Technology

27
Dental Smartmirror

27
Digital Seat Media

27
Discover Financia…

27
Drylock

27
Dynaenergetics &…

27
Design Ideas ◀

27

What this shows Design holds 27 patents at rank #11,230, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Design

By rank, the assignees closest to #11,230 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Design's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Design, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials), Design ranks #1,165 of 3,365 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (22 here).

Anji Weiyu Furniture Co., Ltd. 22 K&H Manufacturing LLC 22 Bestter (Xiamen) Technology Inc. 22 Lasko Operations Holdings LLC 22

Design's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Design Ideas, Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	11.1%
2016	3	11.1%
2017	2	7.4%
2018	1	3.7%
2019	3	11.1%
2020	5	18.5%
2021	2	7.4%
2022	1	3.7%
2024	3	11.1%
2025partial year	4	14.8%

Which technologies does Design Ideas, Ltd. patent most?

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 3

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 3

A47B - TABLES; DESKS; Office FURNITURE; CABINETS; DRAWERS; General Details OF Furniture 3

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Design Ideas, Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Design Ideas, Ltd.'s lead technology class is B65D (Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR F), 11.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B65D
Ranked #11,229 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Design Ideas, Ltd. against Denso Electronics Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 21.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.